Citation: | YE Hanhui, MAO Ming, BU Zhanyu. Seismic performance of glass fiber reinforced polymer tube confined prefabricated concrete pier[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. |
The application of prefabricated assembly pier systems in medium-high intensity seismic regions is often restricted by their seismic performance. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) has been widely applied in the field of bridge seismic resistance. However, up to now, the seismic performance of the "equivalent cast-in-place" fabricated piers with GFRP tube-confined and grouting sleeve connections has not been studied. A simple and effective new structural form is proposed to meet the higher seismic fortification requirements by combining the FRP confined concrete system with the prefabricated pier system. The research results can provide reference for the seismic design and practical engineering application of GFRP tube confined prefabricated concrete pier.
Two GFRP tube confined concrete specimens and one unconfined concrete comparison specimen were designed and fabricated. The seismic performance of pier was studied based on pseudo-static test, including hysteretic properties, deformation and load bearing properties, stiffness, energy dissipation capacity and residual displacement. To measure the deformation development of pier specimens and the restraining effect of GFRP tube during the loading test, the vertical strain gauges of connecting steel bars, the circumferential and vertical strain gauges of concrete surface, the circumferential strain gauges of GFRP tube surface and the linear displacement sensors distributed along the pier height were laid. Based on the Park-Ang two-parameter seismic failure model and the improved Park-Ang model, the damage index of the specimen was calculated, and the drift rate was directly used to correspond to the damage state of the pier, and the suggested damage quantification interval and qualitative description were given.
The failure height at the top of the pier column in the SPC loading direction was less than 250mm, and the failure height at the bottom was less than 175mm, and the degree was lighter than that at the top. The damage of GFRP tubes for SPCG1 and SPCG2 was not serious, and only the local fiber cracking, peeling and whitening phenomena were observed on the surface of GFRP tubes within the height range of 100mm at the bottom. The maximum circumferential strain of SPCG1 and SPCG2 at 100mm and 175mm height was 0.96% and 0.35%, 0.23% and 0.2%, respectively, and the strain at other heights was at a low level. The curvature was basically symmetric along the mid-span section of the column, and the curvature of SPCG1 and SPCG2 was smaller than that of SPC at most loading displacement levels. Compared with SPC, the ultimate displacement of SPCG1 and SPCG2 was increased by 23.2% and 30.9%, the ductility coefficient was increased by 16.7% and 54.6%, and the residual bearing capacity of SPCG1 and SPCG2 was increased by 103.3% and 90.4% respectively at 7%. When the drift rate was 0~7%, the cumulative hysteretic energy consumption of the specimen was SPC>SPCG2>SPCG1. When the drift rate was 7%, the residual displacement of SPC, SPCG1 and SPCG2 was 106.0mm, 83.3mm and 72.1mm, respectively. The results of damage index calculated by Park-Ang model and improved Park-Ang model were not much different in most cases. Compared with SPCG1 and SPCG2, the difference of calculation results of SPC using different models was greater. In the whole process of displacement loading, the damage index of SPC was obviously higher than that of SPCG1 and SPCG2.Conclusions: Both the cast-in-place column top and the prefabricated column bottom of SPC form sufficient plastic hinge area, which belongs to ductile bending failure. The prefabricated structure at the bottom has the same seismic performance as the cast-in-place structure at the top. The failure of concrete and the fracture of steel bar at the joint of the prefabricated pier are the main reasons limiting its seismic performance. The measured average curvature distribution satisfies the deformation mode of the double-curvature column, in which the GFRP tube constrained specimen has lower curvature and better bending resistance. GFRP tube effectively limits the development of shear oblique cracks and lateral expansion of concrete, prevents the concrete protective layer from falling off, and delays the yield and fracture of steel bars. Constrained by GFRP tubes, the ultimate deformation, ductility and bearing capacity under large displacement of prefabricated concrete piers are improved, and the residual displacement is reduced. Therefore, the specimens have stronger lateral resistance, greater safety reserve and certain self-resetting ability. The damage quantization interval and qualitative description of the prefabricated pier are given based on the drift rate of the pier top directly.
[1] |
王景全, 王震, 高玉峰, 等. 预制桥墩体系抗震性能研究进展: 新材料、新理念、新应用[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(3): 1-23.
WANG Jingquan, WANG Zhen, GAO Yufeng, et al. Review on aseismic behavior of precast piers: new material, new concept, and new application[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(3): 1-23(in Chinese).
|
[2] |
SHIELD C K. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures[R]. Farminton Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2017.
|
[3] |
梅葵花, 王凤轩, 孙胜江. 纤维增强复合材料加固混凝土桥梁结构研究进展[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2024, 41(1): 31-51.
MEI Kuihua, WANG Fengxuan, SUN Shengjiang. Research progress of fiber reinforced polymer in strengthening concrete bridge structure[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2024, 41(1): 31-51(in Chinese).
|
[4] |
MONTI G, NISTICò N, SANTINI S. Design of FRP jackets for upgrade of circular bridge piers[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2001, 5(2): 94-101. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(94)
|
[5] |
HAROUN M A, ELSANADEDY H M. Behavior of cyclically loaded squat reinforced concrete bridge columns upgraded with advanced composite-material jackets[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005, 10(6): 741-748. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(741)
|
[6] |
黄镜渟, 高鹏, 周安, 等. 纤维增强树脂复合材料布约束不同强度混凝土配筋柱抗震性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(11): 5625-5636.
HUANG Jingting, GAO Peng, ZHOU An, et al. Seismic performance of FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns with different concrete strength[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(11): 5625-5636(in Chinese).
|
[7] |
ELGAWADY M, ENDESHAW M, MCLEAN D, et al. Retrofitting of rectangular columns with deficient lap splices[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2010, 14(1): 22-35. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000047
|
[8] |
SEIBLE F, PRIESTLEY M J N, HEGEMIER G A, et al. Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 1997, 1(2): 52-62. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52)
|
[9] |
ZHU Z Y, AHMAD I , MIRMIRAN A. Seismic performance of concrete-filled FRP tube columns for bridge substructure[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(3): 359-370.
|
[10] |
SADEGHIAN P, FAM A. Closed-form model and parametric study on connection of concrete-filled FRP tubes to concrete footings by direct embedment[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 137(5): 346-354. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000231
|
[11] |
SADEGHIAN P, LAI Y C, FAM A. Testing and modeling of a new moment connection of concrete-filled FRP tubes to footings under monotonic and cyclic loadings[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2011, 15(4): 653-662. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000198
|
[12] |
ELGAWADY M, BOOKER A J, DAWOOD H M. Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2010, 14(5): 616-628. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000107
|
[13] |
ELGAWADY M A, SHA’LAN A. Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16(3): 328-339. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000174
|
[14] |
MOUSTAFA A, ELGAWADY M A. Shaking table testing of segmental hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(5): 04018020. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001238
|
[15] |
张紫林. 灌浆GFRP套管约束预制节段桥墩抗震性能研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2022.
ZHANG Zilin. Seismic performance of precast segmental piers confined by grouted GFRP tubes[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining & Technology, 2022(in Chinese).
|
[16] |
尹超. 节段拼装式BFRP管材约束混凝土墩柱拟静力试验及数值分析研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
YIN Chao. Quasi-static test and numerical analysis of segmental concrete-filled BFRP tube[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020(in Chinese).
|
[17] |
魏红一, 肖纬, 王志强, 等. 采用套筒连接的预制桥墩抗震性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(7): 1010-1016. DOI: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-74x.2016.07.005
WEI Hongyi, XIAO Wei, WANG Zhiqiang, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of precast bridge pier with grouted splice sleeve[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(7): 1010-1016(in Chinese). DOI: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-74x.2016.07.005
|
[18] |
徐文靖, 马骉, 黄虹, 等. 套筒连接的预制拼装桥墩抗震性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(10): 93-104. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.11.0667
XU Wenjing, MA Biao, HUANG Hong, et al. The seismic performance of precast bridge piers with grouted sleeves[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(10): 93-104(in Chinese). DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.11.0667
|
[19] |
HABER Z B, SAIIDI M S, SANDERS D H. Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(3): 639-650.
|
[20] |
HABER Z B, MACKIE K R, AL-JELAWY H M. Testing and analysis of precast columns with grouted sleeve connections and shifted plastic hinging[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22(10): 04017078. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001105
|
[21] |
张凯迪, 贾俊峰, 程寿山, 等. 等同现浇预制装配桥墩抗震性能研究综述[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2022, 48(12): 1248-1259. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2021100009
ZHANG Kaidi, JIA Junfeng, CHENG Shoushan, et al. Seismic performance of emulative cast-in-place precast bridge columns-state of the art review[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2022, 48(12): 1248-1259(in Chinese). DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2021100009
|
[22] |
叶晗晖, 徐声亮, 茅鸣, 等. 纤维缠绕GFRP管约束混凝土的轴压性能与设计模型[J]. 复合材料学报, 2024, 41(8): 4246-4258.
YE Hanhui, XU Shengliang, MAO Ming, et al. Axial compressive performance and design model of fiber wound GFRP tube confined concrete[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41(8): 4246-4258(in Chinese).
|
[23] |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’ Republic of China. Code for design of concrete structures: GB 50010—2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015(in Chinese).
|
[24] |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程: JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’ Republic of China. Specification for seismic test of buildings: JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015(in Chinese).
|
[25] |
冯鹏, 强翰霖, 叶列平. 材料、构件、结构的“屈服点”定义与讨论[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(3): 36-46. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.03.0192
FENG Peng, QIANG Hanlin, YE Lieping. Discussion and definition on yield points of materials, members and structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(3): 36-46(in Chinese). DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.03.0192
|
[26] |
American National Standards Institute. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings: ASCE/SEI 41-17[S]. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.
|
[27] |
陈嵘, 雷俊卿. 变轴力钢筋混凝土墩柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(18): 131-139.
CHEN Rong, LEI Junqing. Experimental investigations on the seismic behaviors of RC bridge piers under variable axial loads[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(18): 131-139(in Chinese).
|
[28] |
顾祥林, 蔡茂, 林峰. 地震作用下钢筋混凝土柱受力性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(11): 160-165+190.
GU Xianglin, CAI Mao, LIN Feng. Study on behavior of RC columns subjected to earthquake[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(11): 160-165+190(in Chinese).
|
[29] |
HEWES J T, PRIESTLEY M J N. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns[R]. La Jolla, California: University of California, San Diego, 2001.
|
[30] |
BU Z Y, GUO J, ZHENG R Y, et al. Cyclic performance and simplified pushover analyses of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with circular section[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2016, 15(2): 297-312. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-016-0323-3
|
[31] |
PARK Y J, ANG A H S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 722-739. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
|
[32] |
PARK Y J, ANG A H S, WEN Y K Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4): 740-757.
|
[33] |
梁金宝, 许维炳, 陈彦江, 等. 基于变形-能量双参数模型的8度区装配式混凝土桥墩抗震性能评估[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2021, 43(2): 14-23.
LIANG Jinbao, XU Weibing, CHEN Yanjiang, et al. Seismic performance of prefabricated concrete piers for high intensity area and its evaluation method based on deformation-energy parameters model[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2021, 43(2): 14-23(in Chinese).
|
[34] |
王东升, 冯启民, 王国新. 考虑低周疲劳寿命的改进Park-Ang地震损伤模型[J]. 土木工程学报, 2004, 37(11): 41-49.
WANG Dongsheng , FENG Qimin, WANG Guoxin. A modified Park-Ang seismic damage model considering low-cycle fatigue life[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2004, 37(11): 41-49(in Chinese).
|
[35] |
付国, 刘伯权, 邢国华. 基于有效耗能的改进Park-Ang双参数损伤模型及其计算研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(7): 84-90. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.01.0051
FU Guo, LIU Boquan, XING Guohua. The research and calculation on modified Park-Ang double parameter seismic damage model based on energy dissipation[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(7): 84-90(in Chinese). DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.01.0051
|
[36] |
HOSE Y, SILVA P, SEIBLE F. Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2000, 16(2): 413-442. DOI: 10.1193/1.1586119
|
[37] |
布占宇, 叶晗晖, 葛胜良, 等. 直接基于位移的预制拼装墩柱抗震设计[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(12): 250-257. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.12.025
BU Zhanyu, YE Hanhui, GE Shengliang, et al. Seismic resistant design of precast segmental columns using direct displacement based design method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(12): 250-257(in Chinese). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.12.025
|
[38] |
胡志坚, 闫明辉, 周知, 等. 预制拼装桥墩地震易损性分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(1): 89-99+108.
HU Zhijian, YAN Minghui, ZHOU Zhi, et al. Seismic vulnerability analysis of precast segmental bridge piers[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(1): 89-99+108(in Chinese).
|
1. |
许敏,田晓锋,兰煜坤,魏士杰,王克飞. 锂离子电池组铜导电带的修饰及性能评估. 当代化工研究. 2024(23): 47-49 .
![]() |