Citation: | ZHAO Yu, HU Haiyang, YAO Tianyun, et al. Theoretical models and meso-scale mechanism of in-layer failure mechanicalbehaviours of 3D printing GFRP[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41(5): 2713-2731. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20230912.001 |
The emergence of 3D printing technology provides a new way to continuously promote the application of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) in the field of bridge engineering. However, the research on the mechanical properties of 3D printing FRP is weak, which seriously restricts the application of this technology in bridge structures. In order to realize the accurate analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printing FRP bridge components, the key mechanical properties of 3D printing FRP were explored based on theoretical and experimental methods.
Firstly, the research object was focused on 3D printing glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), and the all-round meso-structures of 3D printing GFRP was obtained by scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the spatial geometry characteristics of printing GFRP were obtained, and the hypothesis of printing filament continuity was proposed. Secondly, based on the hypothesis and the in-plane stress rotation axis model, the Young’s modulus analysis and prediction model of 3D printing GFRP under in-layer stress was constructed. At the same time, considering multiple failure modes of the material, a tensile strength prediction model under in-plane stress was established based on Tsai-Wu theory, and four different shear strength calculation modes were considered in this model. Lastly, considering the printing angle, filament width, and layer thickness, systematic testing and analysis of Young’s modulus and tensile strength were designed to verify the accuracy of the above two theoretical models.
Young’s modulus: ①There is an obvious negative correlation between printing angle and Young’s modulus. When the printing angle increases from 0° to 90°, the decrease range of Young’s modulus is 65.48%~79.62%. ②The filament width has obvious influence on Young’s modulus. The Young’s modulus with 0.6mm and 0.8mm filament width are similar to each other, and both are significantly bigger than that with 0.4mm filament width. The variation range of Young’s modulus is 20.18%~49.27%. ③The relative errors of Young's modulus between theoretical results and test data are basically kept within 15%, which indicates that the theoretical model can accurately predict the effect of printing angle on the Young's modulus of 3D printing GFRP. Tensile strength: ①There is an obvious negative correlation between printing angle and tensile strength. When the printing angle increases from 0° to 90°, the decrease range of tensile strength is 50.99%~71.55%. ②The filament width has obvious influence on tensile strength. The tensile strength with 0.6mm and 0.8mm filament width are similar to each other, and both are significantly bigger than that with 0.4mm filament width. The variation range of tensile strength is 27.53%~54.55%. ③Almost all tensile strength test data are included in the tensile strength envelope, which indicates that the theoretical model can accurately predict the tensile strength of 3D printing GRFP. Failure results at macro-scale: ①There are two types of failure modes, namely printing filament fracture and printing filament separation, and the distribution intervals of the two types of failure modes are similar under the same printing filament width. ②The probability of printing filament separation failure mode under 0.4mm filament width is greater, and the probability of printing filament fracture failure mode under the other two types of printing filament width is greater. ③The printing filament separation failure mode occurs when the printing angle is large, and this kind of failure mode will cause the tensile strength to decrease significantly. Failure results at meso-scale: ①The existence of open void and enclosed void leads to stress concentration, and then significantly reduce the mechanical properties of materials, especially various strength properties. ②The direction of short glass fibers is roughly parallel to the direction of printing filament, so it only enhances the 3D printing GFRP in the direction of printing filament, and the fiber bridging effect between the printing filaments is weak. ③A larger printing filament width will significantly reduce the occurrence probability of two types of defects, then higher and more stable mechanical properties can be obtained.Conclusions: ①The printing angle and filament width have obvious effects on the two types of key mechanical properties of 3D printing GFRP, while the effect of printing layer thickness can be ignored. ②The two types of theoretical models established this time can accurately predict the influence of printing parameters on the key mechanical properties of 3D printing GFRP. ③The macro-scale analysis of tensile failure results shows that there are two types of failure modes, namely printing filament fracture and printing filament separation. ④Defects are the key factors that affect the mechanical properties of materials. When the printing filament width is larger, the occurrence probability of defects is lower, then higher and more stable mechanical properties can be obtained.
[1] |
冯鹏. 复合材料在土木工程中的发展与应用[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2014, 241(9): 99-104.
FENG Peng. Development and application of composite in civil engineering[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2014, 241(9): 99-104(in Chinese).
|
[2] |
梅葵花, 李雪, 李宇, 等. 大吨位CFRP拉索锚固系统静力性能研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(2): 76-87.
MEI Kuihua, LI Xue, LI Yu, et al. Study on static performance of large-tonnage anchorage system with CFRP cable[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(2): 76-87(in Chinese).
|
[3] |
梅葵花, 孙亚民, 孙晨然, 等. CFRP筋新型机械夹持-黏结型复合式锚具短期静力性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(1): 66-78.
MEI Kuihua, SUN Yamin, SUN Chenran, et al. Short-term performance of a novel mechanical-bond composite anchorage with CFRP tendons[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(1): 66-78(in Chinese).
|
[4] |
周竞洋, 汪昕, 吴智深, 等. FRP拉索锚固体系优化及其静力性能评价[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(2): 88-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.02.007
ZHOU Jingyang, WANG Xin, WU Zhishen, et al. Optimization and static behavior evaluation of fiber-reinforced polymer cable anchor system[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(2): 88-97(in Chinese). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.02.007
|
[5] |
WANG L C, ZHANG J Y, XU J, et al. Anchorage systems of CFRP cables in cable structures—A review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 160: 82-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.134
|
[6] |
侯苏伟, 张昊, 张艳霞, 等. CFRP丝股新型锚固系统受力分析及试验研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(4): 135-145. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2023.04.012
HOU Suwei, ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Yanxia, et al. Stress analysis and experimental research on a new CFRP wire strand anchorage system[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 135-145(in Chinese). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2023.04.012
|
[7] |
冯鹏, 张汉青, 冯鑫淼, 等. 3D打印技术在工程建设中的应用及前景[J]. 工业建筑, 2019, 49(12): 154-165, 194. DOI: 10.13204/j.gyjz201912027
FENG Peng, ZHANG Hanqing, FENG Xinmiao, et al. The prospects and applications of 3D printing for construction[J]. Industrial Construction, 2019, 49(12): 154-165, 194(in Chinese). DOI: 10.13204/j.gyjz201912027
|
[8] |
TOFAIL S A M, KOUMOULOS E P, BANDYOPADHYAY A, et al. Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities[J]. Materials Today, 2018, 21(1): 22-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001
|
[9] |
LU B H, LI D C, TIAN X Y. Development trends in additive manufacturing and 3D printing[J]. Engineering, 2015, 1(1): 85-89. DOI: 10.15302/J-ENG-2015012
|
[10] |
胡艺伟, 李亚智, 李彪, 等. 纤维增强聚合物基复合材料熔融堆积成型技术的研究进展及产品的力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2021, 38(4): 979-996.
HU Yiwei, LI Yazhi, LI Biao, et al. 3D printed fibre-reinforced polymer composites-review of the fused deposition modeling process and mechanical performance of products[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(4): 979-996(in Chinese).
|
[11] |
田小永, 刘腾飞, 杨春成, 等. 高性能纤维增强树脂基复合材料3D打印及其应用探索[J]. 航空制造技术, 2016, 59(15): 26-31. DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2016.15.026
TIAN Xiaoyong, LIU Tengfei, YANG Chuncheng, et al. 3D printing for high performance fiber reinforced polymer composites and exploration on its applications[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 59(15): 26-31(in Chinese). DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2016.15.026
|
[12] |
HAO W F, LIU Y, ZHOU H, et al. Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites[J]. Polymer Testing, 2018, 65: 29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.004
|
[13] |
LI H M, LIU B S, GE L, et al. Mechanical performances of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites printed in vacuum[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2021, 225: 109277. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109277
|
[14] |
SHANG J F, TIAN X Y, LUO M, et al. Controllable inter-line bonding performance and fracture patterns of continuous fiber reinforced composites by sinusoidal-path 3D printing[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2020, 192: 108096. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108096
|
[15] |
LIU T F, TIAN X Y, ZHANG M Y, et al. Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, 114: 368-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001
|
[16] |
张曼玉, 刘腾飞, 田小永, 等. 面向3D打印的连续碳纤维上浆工艺及其对复合材料性能的影响[J]. 中国材料进展, 2020, 39(5): 349-355, 363. DOI: 10.7502/j.issn.1674-3962.201910003
ZHANG Manyu, LIU Tengfei, TIAN Xiaoyong, et al. Sizing process of continuous carbon fiber for 3D printing and its influence on the properties of composites[J]. Materials China, 2020, 39(5): 349-355, 363(in Chinese). DOI: 10.7502/j.issn.1674-3962.201910003
|
[17] |
张帆, 尚雯, 谭跃刚. 连续碳纤维复合材料3D打印的切片方向调控[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2019, 344(10): 170-173.
ZHANG Fan, SHANG Wen, TAN Yuegang. Slicing direction control algorithm for continuous carbon fiber composite 3D printing[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2019, 344(10): 170-173(in Chinese).
|
[18] |
董嫣然, 谭跃刚, 张帆, 等. 连续碳纤维3D打印的压力轨迹实时跟踪算法研究[J]. 数字制造科学, 2020, 18(1): 111-117.
DONG Yanran, TAN Yuegang, ZHANG Fan, et al. Real-time tracking algorithm of pressure trajectory for the continuous carbon fiber 3D printing[J]. Digital Manufacture Science, 2020, 18(1): 111-117(in Chinese).
|
[19] |
LI N Y, LI Y G, LIU S T. Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2016, 238: 218-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025
|
[20] |
LIU S T, LI Y G, LI N Y. A novel free-hanging 3D printing method for continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic lattice truss core structures[J]. Materials and Design, 2018, 137: 235-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.007
|
[21] |
CAMINERO M A, CHACÓN J M, GARCÍA-MORENO I, et al. Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 148: 93-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054
|
[22] |
CAMINERO M A, CHACÓN J M, GARCÍA-MORENO I, et al. Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling[J]. Polymer Testing, 2018, 68: 415-423. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038
|
[23] |
MOHAMMADIZADEH M, IMERI A, FIDAN I, et al. 3D printed fiber reinforced polymer composites-structural analysis[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 175: 107112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107112
|
[24] |
HE Q H, WANG H J, FU K K, et al. 3D printed continuous CF/PA6 composites: Effect of microscopic voids on mechanical performance[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2020, 191: 108077. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108077
|
[25] |
KASMI S, GINOUX G, ALLAOUI S, et al. Investigation of 3D printing strategy on the mechanical performance of coextruded continuous carbon fiber reinforced PETG[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2021, 138(37): 50955. DOI: 10.1002/app.50955
|
[26] |
German Institute for Standardization. Plastics-determination of tensile properties-Part 4: Test conditions for isotropic and orthotropic fibre-reinforced plastic composites: DIN EN ISO 527-4—1997[S]. Berlin: German Institute for Standardization, 1997.
|
[27] |
SOMIREDDY M, SINGH C V, CZEKANSKI A. Mechanical behaviour of 3D printed composite parts with short carbon fiber reinforcements[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 107: 104232. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104232
|
[28] |
YAO T Y, OUYANG H J, DAI S, et al. Effects of manufacturing micro-structure on vibration of FFF 3D printing plates: Material characterisation, numerical analysis and experimental study[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 268: 113970. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113970
|
[29] |
YAO T Y, ZHANG K, DENG Z C, et al. A novel generalized stress invariant-based strength model for inter-layer failure of FFF 3D printing PLA material[J]. Materials and Design, 2020, 193: 108799. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108799
|
[1] | ZHANG Senlin, WU Zhen, REN Xiaohui. Enhanced theory and finite element method for wrinkling analysis of composite sandwich structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2023, 40(8): 4840-4848. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20221110.002 |
[2] | CHENG Shuliang, WU Lingjie, SUN Shuai, YANG Shuo, XIN Yajun. Experiment and numerical simulation of dynamic mechanical properties of X-lattice sandwich structure under local impact[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(7): 3641-3651. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210903.005 |
[3] | ZHANG Yawen, CHEN Bingzhi, SHI Shanshan, MAO Haitao. Low-velocity impact performance of grid-honeycomb hybrid core sandwich structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(1): 381-389. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210311.002 |
[4] | ZHANG Jiarui, ZHAI Guangtao, LI Wenli. Fabrication and compression performance of continuous fiber Octet-truss lattice sandwich structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(6): 1767-1774. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20201209.001 |
[5] | CONG Lixin, SUN Yuguo, GAO Liang, CHEN Peng. Preparation and compression performance of an improved V-type folded GFRP sandwich structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2014, 31(2): 456-464. |
[6] | XU Menghui, QIU Zhiping. Uncertain analysis and optimization of compressive property of all-composite lattice truss core sandwich structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2013, 30(4): 177-184. |
[7] | LIU Sui, GUAN Zhidong, GUO Xia, SUN Kai, LIU Weiping, KONG Jiaoyue. Process parameters effect on the edgewise compressive behavior of repaired honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2013, 30(3): 177-183. |
[8] | ZHANG Jiaying, DUAN Yuexin, ZHAO Yan, CHEN Jiping. Interface properties of foam-core sandwich structures fabricated by VARI process[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2013, 30(1): 73-82. |
[9] | SUN Yuguo, GAO Liang. Heat transfer characteristics of composite sandwich structure with lattice cores[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2011, 28(4): 185-195. |
[10] | 缝纫泡沫夹芯复合材料失效强度的理论预测与试验验证[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2010, 27(5): 108-115. |
1. |
付强,李浩明,彭磊,李智,林木松,张丽,谢松瑜,唐征海,郭宝春. 填充型导热绝缘硅橡胶复合材料的研究进展. 绝缘材料. 2024(09): 1-14 .
![]() |