LIU Zhendong, ZHENG Xitao, FENG Yan, et al. Structural design and test verification of all-composite wing for unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2016, 33(5): 1055-1063. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20160122.002
Citation: LIU Zhendong, ZHENG Xitao, FENG Yan, et al. Structural design and test verification of all-composite wing for unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2016, 33(5): 1055-1063. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20160122.002

Structural design and test verification of all-composite wing for unmanned aerial vehicle

More Information
  • Received Date: October 26, 2015
  • Revised Date: November 16, 2015
  • In order to improve the ratio of effective load to wing mass (load/mass ratio) of all-composite wing, a finite element simulate approach was proposed to predict the ultimate load of all-composite wing, and the structural design framework which can raise the structural efficiency of wing was established. First, based on the thin-walled engineering beam theory, theoretical analysis was conducted on all-composite wing, and the initial design of structure form and lay-ups form for all-composite wing was preceded. Then, based on the testing data of initial wing, four kinds of different finite element models were built using ABAQUS, and the best numerical simulate approach was obtained by contrast. After that, fourteen kinds of structure configuration forms were established and each structure form were given with different lay-up plans, thus one hundred and seventeen design plans for wing were formed, the load/mass ratios and manufacture factors of each structure form were contrasted. Finally, the all-composite wing was manufactured and test verification was conducted. The results show that double I-beam structure is the best structure configuration form of wing, which has relatively high load bearing efficiency. The relative error between simulated load and testing value is only 1.91%, which verifies the correctness of finite element model. The load/mass ratio of wing reaches 24.17 N/g, which is 30.65% higher comparing with that of the initial design. The conclusions obtained show that the design approach is valid.
  • Related Articles

    [1]JI Yundong, ZHENG Kaidong, CAO Dongfeng, WANG Yao, ZHONG Feisheng. Numerical calculation of tensile failure behavior of sand/resin composite model based on extended finite element and cohesive behavior[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(12): 2851-2859. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190305.003
    [2]TAN Huancheng, XU Shanying, HUANG Xiong, GUAN Yupu, CHEN Wei. Macro-scale finite element model for impact damage simulation and experimental verification of three-dimensional four-directional braided composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(5): 1139-1148. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20170821.002
    [3]LI Xueqin, CHEN Ke, LIU Gang. Finite element modeling and analysis of composite propeller blade based on ANSYS[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2017, 34(4): 819-826. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20160712.001
    [4]SHAN Zhongde, KANG Huairong, ZANG Yong, LIU Feng. Microscopic structure model and finite element simulation of mechanical properties of fiber-bar composites reinforced by three dimensional weaving[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2015, 32(1): 138-149. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20140408.002
    [5]ZHANG Chao, XU Xiwu, GUO Shuxiang. Microstructure model and finite element analysis of mechanical properties of 2D 1×1 biaxial braided composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2011, 28(6): 215-222. DOI: CNKI:11-1801/TB.20110720.1424.033
    [6]缝纫泡沫夹芯复合材料失效强度的理论预测与试验验证[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2010, 27(5): 108-115.
    [7]ZHANG Chunli, HUANG Zhengming, DONG Guohua. Finite element ultimate analysis and design of composite wind turbine blade based on non-linear constitutive relationship[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2007, 24(2): 174-183.
    [8]ZHANG Hongyan, LI Luxian, SHEN Yapeng. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL AND EFFECT OF MATERIAL PARAMETERSON PROPERTIES OF 3-3 PIEZOCOMPOSITES[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2005, 22(2): 160-165.
    [9]YAN Xiang-qiao. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS MODEL OF STEADY ROLLING TIRES[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2001, 18(4): 108-114.
    [10]XU Chong-hai, SUN De-ming, FENG Yan-xia, HUANG Chuan-zhen, AI Xing. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF THE RESIDUAL THERMAL STRESSES IN MULTIPHASE COMPOSITE CERAMIC TOOL MATERIAL[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2001, 18(3): 91-96.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 冯正建,胡琦,李欣,刘其琛,刘张君,王昆. 某高速无人机机翼结构设计与气动弹性分析. 机械制造与自动化. 2025(01): 192-196 .
    2. 刘峰,乔宇,李雪江,豆广征. 轻木夹芯/碳纤维复合材料结构后推构型无人机机身设计与分析. 复合材料科学与工程. 2024(04): 56-62+96 .
    3. 白皓,商伟辉,邹志伟,李玉龙,董志武,任杭. 复合材料层压板结构铺层设计的三级优化方法. 高科技纤维与应用. 2024(03): 44-55 .
    4. 王尕平,姚作霖,郑会龙,宣凯涛. 某无人机复合材料机翼结构强度的有限元分析. 航空精密制造技术. 2024(06): 17-21 .
    5. 方博琳,唐家砼,夏侯振华,王进,赵星吉. 某固定翼无动力滑翔机设计与优化. 科学技术创新. 2022(16): 17-20 .
    6. 刘振东,郑锡涛,范雯静,张东健. 固化残余应力对无人机复合材料机翼强度的影响. 航空学报. 2022(06): 273-282 .
    7. 陈刚,王校培,宋军,唐军军,沈浩杰. 某高载荷大后掠无人机复合材料机翼结构设计与试验验证. 南京航空航天大学学报. 2021(04): 613-619 .
    8. 王凯,贺强. 聚甲基丙烯酰亚胺泡沫夹层结构全生命周期的关键技术研究进展. 复合材料学报. 2020(08): 1805-1822 . 本站查看
    9. 邵家儒,刘牛,曾宪君,张月月. 复合材料机翼结构力学分析及连接设计. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学). 2020(10): 126-133 .
    10. 刘峰,代海亮,王坤,高鸿渐. 十公斤级固定翼无人机全碳纤维机翼设计与应力分析. 宇航材料工艺. 2019(04): 50-55 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1590) PDF downloads (660) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return