Research status and analysis of cement and geopolymer hydrophobic composites
-
摘要: 混凝土的长期耐久性问题是其面临的主要问题之一，造成耐久性破坏的主要原因是水在混凝土的多孔结构中的迁移，使有害离子更容易进入基材内部。采用超疏水材料对水泥及地聚物进行改性复合处理，赋予其超疏水特性，避免水分在其孔隙中的传输，从而防止有害离子的迁移及侵蚀，增强混凝土的耐久性。本文总结了目前研究当中对于水泥及地聚物胶凝材料超疏水改性方法，包括整体改性和表面改性两种；归纳了整体改性方式中超疏水改性剂加入到水泥及地聚物混凝土中的改性机制，以及与无机物基体中的连接键合方式；概括了目前研究当中表面改性常用的改性方法，包括喷涂法、浸渍法、模板法等，并分析了表面改性机制。与表面改性所得到的超疏水复合涂层相比，整体改性的水泥及地聚物基复合材料在实际应用场景当中具有更大的优势。此外，分析了疏水改性后对复合材料润湿性、防水性、抗压性能以及防腐性能的影响规律，发现其抗压强度降低了约20%~60%。最后，阐述了水泥及地聚物复合材料的疏水改性研究中存在的一些问题并对未来的研究方向进行了展望，建议从体积型超疏水、提高抗压强度、成本控制及疏水外加剂在材料内部实现均匀化分散等方面进行研究。Abstract: The long-term durability of concrete is one of the main problems it faces, and the main cause of durability damage is the migration of water in the porous structure of concrete, which makes it easier for harmful ions to enter the interior of the substrate. Modifying the cement and geopolymer with superhydrophobic materials is a valid method to avoid the transmission of water, thereby preventing the migration of harmful ions and increased its durability of concrete. This review summarized the superhydrophobic modification methods of cement and geopolymer cementitious materials and categorized into superhydrophobic surface and bulk modification; the modification mechanism of superhydrophobic modifier added to cement and geopolymer and their bonding mode with inorganic matrix in the internal modification method. Besides, the modification methods commonly used for surface modification in the present research are summarized, divided into external coating, maceration, template method, etc., and the surface modification mechanism is analyzed. Compared with the superhydrophobic composite coatings, the monolithically modified cement and geopolymer matrix composites have greater advantages in practical application scenarios. In addition, the effects of hydrophobic modification on the wettability, waterproofing, compressive properties and anti-corrosion properties of composites are concluded, and their compressive strength was reduced by about 20%~60%. Finally, some problems in the research of hydrophobic modification of cement and geopolymer composites are described and the future research direction is prospected, and it is suggested to carry out research on volumetric super-hydrophobicity, improvement of compressive strength, cost control, and homogeneous dispersion of hydrophobic admixture inside the material.
-
图 1 水泥或地聚物材料的改性机制
Figure 1. Mechanisms for modification of cement or geopolymer materials
图 2 水泥基材料中不同改性剂的改性机制图
Figure 2. Modification mechanism diagram of different modifiers in cementitious materials
图 3 地聚物材料中不同改性剂的改性机制图
Figure 3. Modification mechanism diagram of different modifiers in geopolymer material
图 4 水泥/地聚物改性后孔隙率变化图
Figure 4. Changes in porosity after cement /geopolymer modifications
图 5 超疏水水泥基材料28 d抗压强度降低程度
Figure 5. Degree of reduction in 28 d compressive strength of superhydrophobic cementitious materials
图 6 未疏水改性和疏水改性水泥基混凝土的SEM对比图
Figure 6. SEM comparison of unhydrophobically modified and hydrophobically modified cementitious concrete
图 7 超疏水地聚物材料28 d抗压强度的升降程度
Figure 7. Degree of elevation and reduction of 28 d compressive strength of superhydrophobic geopolymer materials
表 1 不同改性方法对水泥及地聚物材料表面改性的优劣对比
Table 1. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of different modification methods for surface modification of cement and geopolymer materials
Cementitious types Coating preparation Method Test method WCA/(°) Surface coating of cementitious materials DC-30 (contains mainly octane-silane and siloxane)[27] External coating Abrasion of 200 grit sandpaper for 20 m under a load of 2.5 kpa 158 Aqueous solution of sodium laurate[33] Maceration — 150 Sandpaper and polydimethylsiloxane [35] Template — 142 Triethoxyoctysilane and diatomaceous earth low
surface materials [36]External coating Sandpaper for 18.00 m under 24.50 kpa load 158 Organosilicon functionalized Al2O3 + solid resins materials [37] External coating 400 cm abrasion of sandpaper under 200 g load 165 Surface coating of geopolymer materials Polymethylhydrosiloxane [40] External coating — 161 Polydimethylsiloxane solution containing
polytetrafuoroethylene /
stearic acid and fly ash [39]Maceration Polydimethylsiloxane -only coatings have higher adhesion than polydimethylsiloxane coatings containing fly ash 159 Notes: WCA—water contact angle 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 整体改性对超疏水水泥及地聚物材料的水化/聚合作用的影响
Table 2. Effect of Integral Modification on the Hydration/Polymerization of Superhydrophobic Cementitious and Geopolymer Materials
Cementitious types Coating preparation Test method Effects on hydration/polymerization WCA/(°) ordinary silicate cement[62] non-toxic lauric acid and covering metal mesh XRD Integral superhydrophobic concrete has fewer hydration products than ordinary silicate concrete. 153 magnesium oxychloride based cement [48] hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsil-oxane XRD、SEM Nanoscale needle-like phases are covered by hydrophobic silicone rubber. >150 ordinary silicate cement[50] functionalization of SiO2 with fluorine-free silanes XRD、FTIR Silanes in superhydrophobic powders react with cement hydration products to slow down the cement hydration rate. 153.8 ordinary silicate cement[61] Stearic acid modified fly ash TGA Fly ash can increase the water-cement ratio and facilitate cement hydration, providing more nucleation sites for cement hydration. 93.2 ordinary silicate cement[64] nano-silica and isobutyl-triethoxysilane isothermal calorimeter Silane can mitigate the loss of flowability caused by nano-silica to some extent, while nano-silica can completely compensate for the delay of silane in the early hydration process. 153.5 fly ash based polymer materials [53] polymethylhydrosiloxane Hot Plate Method Thermal conductivity decreases with increasing amount of polymethylhydrosiloxane, and the higher the porosity, the lower the bulk density. 161 fly ash based polymer materials [58] polymethylhydrosiloxane TEM Grafting of poly(methylhydrosiloxane) is not exactly proportional to the amount of geopolymer produced. 152 fly ash-slag base polymer materials [56] isooctyltriethoxysilane BSE、EDX Silanes slow down the hydration kinetics, while the increase in the modulus of the alkali activator inhibits the formation of hydration products. 118.1 slag mortar [57] polydimethylsiloxane MIP、SEM、EDS Polydimethylsiloxane increases internal defects in the body. 128
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同改性剂的超疏水水泥基材料的接触角和滑动角
Table 3. WCA and SA of superhydrophobic cementitious materials with different modifiers
Cementitious types Hydrophobic Modifiers Modification type WCA/(°) SA/(°) ordinary silicate cement [62] 0.8 wt% non-toxic lauric acid Integral 153 10 magnesium oxychloride based cement [48] 6 wt% hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane Integral ＞150 ＜10 high belite sulphoaluminate cement [65] lauric acid Integral 153.2 — ordinary silicate cement [66] 1H, 1H, 1H, 2H-perfluorodecyl-triethoxysilane Surface 163.3 — ordinary silicate cement [67] contains mainly octane-silane and siloxane Surface 160±1 6.5±0.5 ordinary silicate cement[68] hydrophobic silica nanoparticles Surface 160 1.7 Notes: SA—sliding angle
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同改性剂的超疏水地聚物材料的接触角和滑动角
Table 4. WCA and SA of superhydrophobic geopolymer materials with different modifiers
Geopolymer types Hydrophobic Modifiers Modification type WCA/(°) SA/(°) calcined clay and slag [69] 5 wt% polydimethylsiloxane Integral 120 — fly ash [70] 5 wt% stearic acid Integral 96.67 — metakaolin[71] 5 wt% polydimethylsiloxane Integral 127.5 — metakaolin [40] polymethylhydrosiloxane Surface 161 2 dust/silicate cement [72] polydimethylsiloxane Surface 154.1 6.1
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 超疏水水泥及地聚物复合材料的吸水率降低程度和原因
Table 5. Extent and causes of water absorption reduction in superhydrophobic cement and geopolymer composites
categories Materials and Dosages Modification type water absorption/% reason ordinary silicate cement 1 wt% stearic acid[74] Integral −86% Surface water is rejected by the surface. 1.4 wt%
cetyltrimethoxysilane[76]Integral −86% The internal inorganic mineralized layer further prevents water intrusion through a relatively dense micro/nano-scale two-layer structure. 5 wt% SiO2 silica solution[30] Surface −90% Hydration products and some unhydrated nanoparticles can clog capillaries, thus blocking water transfer paths. geopolymer materials 60 wt% iron ore tailings +1.5 wt% stearic acid[79] Integral −43% The particle size of superhydrophobic iron ore tailing is much smaller than that of sand, and the fine superhydrophobic iron ore tailing can easily fill up the pores of the mortar, making the mortar more dense and leading to a decrease in water absorption. 10 wt% hydrophobic metakaolin + polydimethylsiloxane [55] Integral −26%~−27.6% Weakening of the capillary's ability to absorb and hold water. polydimethylsiloxane + polypropylene fiber [81] Integral −70% Polypropylene fiber easily adsorbs polydimethylsiloxane but does not easily trap water vapor, blocking the water vapor diffusion channel.
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 超疏水水泥及地聚物材料的腐蚀电位和腐蚀电流密度
Table 6. Corrosion potential and corrosion current density of superhydrophobic cement and geopolymer materials
Concrete material name Hydrophobic Modifiers Ecror /V Icorr/(A·cm−2) hardened cement mortar [47] polydimethylsiloxane − 0.07204 4.10×10−8 superhydrophobic surface for concrete [29] stearic acid − 0.28225 — superhydrophobic concrete [82] containing silane and siloxane — 7.702×10−6 superhydrophobic concrete [52] lauric acid −0.477 1.26×10−5 superhydrophobic concrete [96] stearic acid −0.173 5.921×10−7 superhydrophobic iron ore tailings [79] stearic acid −0.321 1.451×10−6 Notes：Ecror is a mixed electrode potential determined by the cathode and anode reactions on the corroded surface; Icorr is the amount of electricity per unit area per unit time of cathodic protection on a metal electrode.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] ZHANG P, CONG Y, VOGEL M, et al. Steel reinforcement corrosion in concrete under combined actions: The role of freeze-thaw cycles, chloride ingress, and surface impregnation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 148: 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.078 [2] WANG X B, XU K N, LI Y H, et al. Dissolution and leaching mechanisms of calcium ions in cement based materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 180: 103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.225 [3] MATAR P, BARHOUN J. Effects of waterproofing admixture on the compressive strength and permeability of recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 32: 101521. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101521 [4] MONTEIRO P J M, MILLER S A, Horvath A. Towards sustainable concrete[J]. Nature Materials, 2017, 16(7): 698-699. [5] SEKKAL W, IZADIFAR M, ZAOUI A, et al. Theoretical investigation of protective graphene-coated metakaolin geopolymer interface under moisture and chemical composition effects[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 430: 119007. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119007 [6] NOUSHINI A, CASTEL A, ALDRED J, et al. Chloride diffusion resistance and chloride binding capacity of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 105: 103290. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.006 [7] CHEN S K, ZHANG Y J, YAN D M, et al. The influence of Si/Al ratio on sulfate durability of metakaolin-based geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 265: 120735. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120735 [8] FLORES-VIVIANL I, HEJAZI V, KOZHUKHOVA M I, et al. Self-assembling particle-siloxane coatings for superhydrophobic concrete[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5(24): 13284-13294. [9] LIU Y Y, CHEN X Q, Xin J H. Super-hydrophobic surfaces from a simple coating method: a bionic nanoengineering approach[J]. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(13): 3259. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/13/030 [10] ZHANG H, HOU C P, SONG L X, et al. A stable 3D sol-gel network with dangling fluoroalkyl chains and rapid self-healing ability as a long-lived superhydrophobic- fabric coating[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 334: 598-610. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.036 [11] WANG X W, MU B, XU J, et al. Reversible thermochromic superhydrophobic BiVO4 hybrid pigments coatings with self-cleaning performance and envi-ronmental stability based on kaolinite[J]. ACS App-lied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(2): 3228-3236. [12] SELIM M S, EL-SAFTY S A, FATTHALLAH N A, et al. Silicone/graphene oxide sheet-alumina nan-orod ternary composite for superhydrophobic antifouling coating[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2018, 121: 160-172. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.04.021 [13] ALBAYRAK A T, YASAR M, GURKAYNAK M A, et al. Investigation of the effects of fatty acids on the compressive strength of the concrete and the grindability of the cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(2): 400-404. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.031 [14] XUE X, LIU Y L, DAI J G, et al. Inhibiting efflorescence formation on fly ash–based geopolymer via silane surface modification[J]. Cement and Concr-ete Composites, 2018, 94: 43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.013 [15] DARMANIN T, GUITTARD F. Recent advances in the potential applications of bioinspired superhydrophobic materials[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(39): 16319-16359. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02071E [16] LATTHE S S, SUTAR R S, KODAG V S, et al. Self–cleaning superhydrophobic coatings: Potential i-ndustrial applications[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2019, 128: 52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.12.008 [17] XIANG T F, HAN Y, GUO Z Q, et al. Fabrication of inherent anticorrosion superhydrophobic surfaces on metals[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 5598-5606. [18] KREDER M J, ALVARENGA J, KIM P, et al. Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery?[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1(1): 1-15. [19] Liu Y Y, Chen X Q, Xin J H. Super-hydrophobic surfaces from a simple coating method: a bionic nanoengineering approach[J]. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(13): 3259. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/13/030 [20] 崔琳晶, 陈德鹏, 吕忠, 等. 超疏水混凝土的制备及应用于防腐防冰领域的研究进展[J]. 功能材料, 2023, 54(6): 6066-6079. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.06.008CUI Linjing, CHEN Depeng, LV Zhong, et al. Research progress on the preparation of superhydrophobic concrete and its application in the field of anticorrosion and anti-icing[J]. Functional Materials, 2023, 54(6): 6066-6079(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.06.008 [21] FAN P X, PAN R, ZHONG M L. Ultrafast laser enabling hierarchical structures for versatile superhydrophobicity with enhanced Cassie–Baxter stability and durability[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(51): 16693-16711. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02986 [22] ZHAO F, ZHAN F, WANG L. Hybrid Topography of Lotus Leaf under Hydrostatic/Hydrodynamic Pre-ssure[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2023, 10(4): 2202044. doi: 10.1002/admi.202202044 [23] XIN L, LI H, GAO J, et al. Large-scale fabrication of decoupling coatings with promising robustness and superhydrophobicity for antifouling, drag reduction, and organic photodegradation[J]. Friction, 2023, 11(5): 716-736. doi: 10.1007/s40544-022-0652-3 [24] DONG W K, LI W G, SUN Z H, et al. Intrinsic graphene/cement-based sensors with piezoresistivity and superhydrophobicity capacities for smart concr-ete infrastructure[J]. Automation in Construction, 2022, 133: 103983. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103983 [25] SAMAMTA A, HUANG W J, BELL M, et al. Large-area surface wettability patterning of metal alloys via a maskless laser-assisted functionalization method[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 568: 150788. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150788 [26] JIANG J W, SHEN Y Z, WANG Z, et al. Design and fabrication superhydrophobic surface with enhanced mechanical durability: Interface bonding effects regulated by an introduced transition oxide layer[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2022, 592: 153199. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153199 [27] XU K, REN S Z, SONG J L, et al. Colorful superhydrophobic concrete coating[J]. Chemical Enginee-ring Journal, 2021, 403: 126348. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126348 [28] WOO R S C, ZHU H, CHOW M M K, et al. Barrier performance of silane–clay nanocomposite coatings on concrete structure[J]. Composites Science A-nd Technology, 2008, 68(14): 2828-2836. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.028 [29] KONG X Q, SHEN Y D, SHI J R, et al. Superh-ydrophobic concrete coating with excellent mechanic-al robustness and anti-corrosion performances[J]. C-olloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2024, 684: 133157. [30] SHE W, YANG J X, HONG J X, et al. Superhydrophobic concrete with enhanced mechanical robustness: Nanohybrid composites, strengthen mechanism and durability evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 247: 118563. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118563 [31] WANG F J, XIE T, OU J F, et al. Cement based superhydrophobic coating with excellent robustness and solar reflective ability[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 823: 153702. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153702 [32] ZHU C X, LV J, CHEN L D, et al. Dark, heat-reflective, anti-ice rain and superhydrophobic cement concrete surfaces[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 220: 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.188 [33] WANG F J, LIU H J, OU J, et al. Fast fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on hardened cement paste using sodium laurate aqueous solution[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 278: 122385. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122385 [34] ZENG Q H, ZHOU H, HUANG J X, et al. Review on the recent development of durable superhydrophobic materials for practical applications[J]. Nanoscale, 2021, 13(27): 11734-11764. doi: 10.1039/D1NR01936H [35] GAO Y N, WANG F Z, LIU P, et al. Superhydrophobic behavior of magnesium oxychloride cement surface with a dual-level fractal structure[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 210: 132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.158 [36] WANG P, YANG Y, Wang H B, et al. Fabrication of super-robust and nonfluorinated superhydrophobic coating based on diatomaceous earth[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 362: 90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.065 [37] YU M D, CUI Z Y, GE F, et al. Fabrication of durable and roughness-regeneration superhydrophobic composite materials by hot pressing[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 179: 107431. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107431 [38] SONG H P, TANG M X, LEI X, et al. Preparation of environment-friendly ultrafine fly ash based s-uperhydrophobic demoulding coating[J]. Applied Su-rface Science, 2021, 566: 150688. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150688 [39] CHINDAPRASIRT P, JITSANGIAM P, PACHANA P K, et al. Self-cleaning superhydrophobic fly ash geopolymer[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 44. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27061-6 [40] LIU Z H, PANG X Q, WANG K T, et al. Superhydrophobic coatings prepared by the in situ growth of silicone nanofilaments on alkali-activated geopol-ymers surface[J]. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2019, 11(25): 22809-22816. [41] LIU L X, HOU Y B, PAN Y, et al. Substrate-versatile approach to fabricate mechanochemically robust and superhydrophobic surfaces from waste fly ash[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2019, 132: 353-361. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.03.052 [42] MASEK Z, DIBLIKOYA L. Hydrophobic impregnation of geopolymer composite by ethoxysilanes[J]. 2018. [43] 冉蕾, 李霞, 蒋丽. 沿海水工混凝土结构表面防水技术[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(23): 222-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.23.034RAN Lei, LI Xia, JIANG Li. Surface waterproofing technology of coastal hydraulic concrete structures[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(23): 222-227(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.23.034 [44] ZHAO J H, GAO X, CHEN S Y, et al. Hydrophobic or superhydrophobic modification of cement-based materials: A systematic review[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 243: 110104. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110104 [45] ELZAABALAWY A, MEGUID S A. Development of novel superhydrophobic coatings using siloxane-modified epoxy nanocomposites[J]. Chemical Engin-eering Journal, 2020, 398: 125403. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125403 [46] GHASEMLOU M, DAVER F, IVANOVA E P, et al. Bio-inspired sustainable and durable superhydrop-hobic materials: from nature to market[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(28): 16643-16670. doi: 10.1039/C9TA05185F [47] WANG F J, LEI S, OU J F, et al. Effect of PDMS on the waterproofing performance and corrosion resistance of cement mortar[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 507: 145016. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145016 [48] LI K, WANG Y S, WANG X, et al. Superhydrophobic magnesium oxychloride cement based composites with integral stability and recyclability[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 118: 103973. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103973 [49] MAO J H, WANG Q, LEI L L, et al. Effects of wettability on the film-forming property of modifie-d cement paste[J]. Construction and Building Mate-rials, 2021, 300: 124068. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124068 [50] CUI L J, XIANG T F, HU B J, et al. Design of monolithic superhydrophobic concrete with excellent anti-corrosion and self-cleaning properties[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2024, 685: 133345. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133345 [51] MORA E, GONZALEZ G, ROMERO P, et al. Control of water absorption in concrete materials by modification with hybrid hydrophobic silica particles[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 221: 210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.086 [52] DAI Z Y, GUO H D, HUANG Q X, et al. Mechanically robust and superhydrophobic concrete based on sacrificial template approach[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 134: 104796. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104796 [53] DONG C L, SHAO N N, YAN F, et al. A novel integration strategy for the foaming and hydrophobi-zation of geopolymer foams[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 160: 106919. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106919 [54] ZHANG D R, ZHU H J, WU Q S, et al. Investigation of the hydrophobicity and microstructure of fly ash-slag geopolymer modified by polydimethylsiloxane[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 369: 130540. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130540 [55] RUAN S Q, CHEN S K, LU J Y, et al. Waterproof geopolymer composites modified by hydrophobic particles and polydimethylsiloxane[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 237: 109865. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109865 [56] SHE Y S, CHEN Y X, LI L J, et al. Understanding the generation and evolution of hydrophobicity of silane modified fly ash/slag based geopolymers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 142: 105206. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105206 [57] TANG D S, YANG C H, SHEN C, et al. Preparing hydrophobic alkali-activated slag mortar with lotus-leaf-like microstructure by adding polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 409: 134148. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134148 [58] PANG B, ZHENG H P, JIN Z Q, et al. Inner superhydrophobic materials based on waste fly ash: Microstructural morphology of microetching effects[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024, 268: 111089. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111089 [59] YAO H, XIE Z L, HUANG C H, et al. Recent progress of hydrophobic cement-based materials: Preparation, characterization and properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 299: 124255. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124255 [60] LIU P, GAO Y N, WANG F Z, et al. Superhydrophobic and self-cleaning behavior of Portland cement with lotus-leaf-like microstructure[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 156: 775-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.211 [61] QU L, SONG W H, WANG Q, et al. Effects of hydrophobic modified fly ash on resistance of chloride corrosion and water penetration of cement mortar in the early hydration stage[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 64: 105573. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105573 [62] XU S S, WANG Q, WANG N, et al. Study of corrosion property and mechanical strength of eco-friendly fabricated superhydrophobic concrete[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 323: 129267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129267 [63] LV X S, CAO W X, YIO M H N, et al. 3D superhydrophobic lightweight foam concrete designed v-ia in-situ foaming and self-assembled silicone micro-films[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 478: 147390. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.147390 [64] YANG J X, SHE W, ZUO W Q, et al. Rational application of nano-SiO2 in cement paste incorporated with silane: Counterbalancing and synergistic effects[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 118: 103959. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103959 [65] ZHANG S F, WANG Q, ZHOU W, et al. A fast-setting and eco-friendly superhydrophobic high belite sulphoaluminate cement mortar[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 23: 2690-2702. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.160 [66] KARTHICK S, PARK D J, LEE Y S, et al. Development of water-repellent cement mortar using silane enriched with nanomaterials[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2018, 125: 48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.08.021 [67] SONG J L, LI Y X, XU W, et al. Inexpensive and non-fluorinated superhydrophobic concrete coating for anti-icing and anti-corrosion[J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2019, 541: 86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.014 [68] LU Z Z, CHEN J, ZHANG X Q. Superhydrophob-ic Coating Deposited on Foamed Concrete with Super-Robust Mechanical and Self-Repairing Properties[J]. Physica Status Solidi (a), 2022, 219(24): 2200417. doi: 10.1002/pssa.202200417 [69] ZHONG W L, ZHANG Y H, FAN L F, et al. Effect of PDMS content on waterproofing and mechanical properties of geopolymer composites[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(18): 26248-26257. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.306 [70] CHINDAPRASIRT P, JITSANGIAM P, RATTANA-SAK U. Hydrophobicity and efflorescence of light-weight fly ash geopolymer incorporated with calcium stearate[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 364: 132449. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132449 [71] RUAN S Q, YAN D M, CHEN S K, et al. Proce-ss and mechanisms of multi-stage water sorptivity in hydrophobic geopolymers incorporating polydimeth-ylsiloxane[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 128: 104460. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104460 [72] WANG F J, XIE T, LEI S, et al. Preparation and properties of foundry dust/Portland cement based c-omposites and superhydrophobic coatings[J]. Constr-uction and Building Materials, 2020, 246: 118466. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118466 [73] ZHU H J, LIANG G W, XU J, et al. Influence of rice husk ash on the waterproof properties of ultrafine fly ash based geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 208: 394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.035 [74] FENG Z J, WANG F J, XIE T, et al. Integral hydrophobic concrete without using silane[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 227: 116678. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116678 [75] RUAN S Q, CHEN S K, LIU Y, et al. Early-age deformation of hydrophobized metakaolin-based ge-opolymers[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 169: 107168. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107168 [76] YIN B, XU T Y, HOU D S, et al. Superhydrophobic anticorrosive coating for concrete through in-situ bionic induction and gradient mineralization[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 257: 119510. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119510 [77] SUN L, XU Y D, WANG J L, et al. Designing a superhydrophobic quality and strengthening Mecha-mism for foam concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 365: 130073. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130073 [78] XU Y, MAO J T, JIANG J, et al. Research on the performance of foamed concrete based on superh-ydrophobic bulk modification[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 438: 137231. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137231 [79] WANG M L, WANG Q, MAO J H, et al. Study on water-repellent and corrosion-resistant properties of cement mortar using superhydrophobic iron ore tailings[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 62: 105360. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105360 [80] RUAN S Q, CHEN S K, ZHU X Y, et al. Matrix wettability and mechanical properties of geopolymer cement-polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) hybrids[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 124: 104268. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104268 [81] RUAN S Q, CHEN S K, LIU Y, et al. Investigation on the effect of fiber wettability on water absorption kinetics of geopolymer composites[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(24): 36678-36689. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.227 [82] XIANG T F, LIU J, LV Z, et al. The effect of silicon-based waterproof agent on the wettability of superhydrophobic concrete and enhanced corrosion resistance[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 313: 125482. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125482 [83] 王波, 钱军, 罗杰, 等. 水工混凝土的超疏水仿生构建及微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(6): 2031-2038.WANG Bo, QIAN Jun, RO Jie, et al. Superhydrophobic biomimetic construction and microscopic me-chanism of hydraulic concrete[J]. Silicate Bulletin, 2024, 43(6): 2031-2038(in Chinese). [84] JEONG Y , KANG S H, KIM M O, et al. Acceleration of cement hydration from supplementary cementitious materials: Performance comparison between silica fume and hydrophobic silica[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 112: 103688. [85] XU L, WANG J J, HU X C, et al. Modification of recycled cement with phosphogypsum and ground granulated blast furnace slag[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 426: 136241. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136241 [86] WANG Y L, LU H J, WANG J J, et al. Effects of highly crystalized nano C-S-H particles on performances of Portland cement paste and its mechanism[J]. Crystals, 2020, 10(9): 816. doi: 10.3390/cryst10090816 [87] WANG J J, XU L, LI M L, et al. Effect of pre-carbonation on the properties of cement paste subject-ed to high temperatures[J]. Journal of Building En-gineering, 2022, 51: 104337. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104337 [88] PASUPATHY K, RAMAKRISHNAN S, SANJAYAN J. Effect of hydrophobic surface-modified fine aggregates on efflorescence control in geopolymer[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 126: 104337. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104337 [89] WANG D F, HE L, WU Y K, et al. Alkali-activated organogeopolymers with volumetric superhydrophob-icity[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2024, 145: 105336. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105336 [90] SEKKAL W, IZADIFAR M, ZAOUI A, et al. Theoretical investigation of protective graphene-coated metakaolin geopolymer interface under moisture and chemical composition effects[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 430: 119007. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119007 [91] ZHAO J B, XIE J H, WU J W, et al. Workability, compressive strength, and microstructures of one-part rubberized geopolymer mortar[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 68: 106088. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106088 [92] XIE J H, WANG J J, RAO R, et al. Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 164: 179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.067 [93] XIE J H, WANG J J, ZHANG B X, et al. Physic-ochemical properties of alkali activated GGBS and fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete[J]. Construc-tion and Building Materials, 2019, 204: 384-398. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.191 [94] 杨潇, 钱如胜, 洪锦祥, 等. 混凝土表面防腐涂料研究进展[J/OL]. 复合材料学报, 1-202024-07-05]. YANG Xiao, QIAN Rusheng, HONG Jinxiang, et al. Research progress of anticorrosion coatings on concrete surface[J/OL]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1-20[2024-07-05] (in Chinese). [95] 方圣雁. 氧化石墨烯/丙烯酸树脂涂层的制备及其对混凝土防护效果的研究 [D]. 广东: 华南理工大学, 2019.FANG Shengyan. The preparation of graphene oxide/acrylic resin coating and its protective effect on concrete [D]. Guangdong: South China University of Technology, 2019(in Chinese). [96] WANG N, WANG Q, XU S S, et al. Green fabrication of mechanically stable superhydrophobic concrete with anti-corrosion property[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 312: 127836. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127836 [97] 来晓鹏, 王元战, 王禹迟, 等. TA/SiO2疏水涂层及其对混凝土抗侵蚀性能的影响[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2024, 27(1): 30-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2024.01.005LAI Xiaopeng, WANG Yuanzhan, WANG Yuchi, et al. TA/SiO2 hydrophobic coating and its effect on erosion resistance of concrete[J]. Journal of Buil-ding Materials, 2024, 27(1): 30-36(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2024.01.005 [98] ZHANG M, XU H Y, ZEZE A L P, et al. Coating performance, durability and anti-corrosion mechanism of organic modified geopolymer composite for marine concrete protection[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 129: 104495. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104495 [99] XIE J H, ZHAO J B, WANG J J, et al. Sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete with GGBS and fly ash-based geopolymer[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(8): 1247. doi: 10.3390/ma12081247 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 64
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
