Direct ink writing of epoxy-based composite lattice and its strengthening and toughening mechanism
-
摘要:
Objectives Epoxy-based composites have been extensively applied in areas such as aerospace and automobile engineering. However, the brittle nature of epoxy resin significantly hindering their applications in practical engineering fields. To simultaneously improve the strength and toughness of the composites, a lattice structure constructed by rationally assembled strengthening and toughening zones is designed. The corresponded direct ink writing fabrication technique is developed, and the effect of inner structure on the mechanical properties is explored. Methods The printability and formation quality of the composite ink materials were characterized using rotational rheometer and optical microscope. The 3D printing process was conducted in a gantry-type 3D printer. An universal testing machine was used to test the mechanical properties of the epoxy-based composite lattices with different structural parameters. Based on the scanning electron microscopy and finite element modeling results, the strengthening and toughening mechanism of the epoxy-based composite lattices were studied. Results The structural parameters have a great impact on the strength and toughness of the composite lattices. Through regulation of the structural parameters, precise predicted and tunable mechanical properties can be achieved. From the rheological analysis, it is found that: 1. The viscosity of the epoxy-based composite ink increases with the increasing filler content and exhibits a shear thinning behavior, which makes it easy to be extruded from the printing nozzle. 2. The storage modulus of the composite ink is one order of magnitude higher than the loss modulus before the shear yield point, indicating its good solid behavior and the capability of retaining its original shape without collapse after extrusion. The optical images show that the epoxy-based composites fabricated by direct ink writing possess highly ordered lattice structure with uniform and adjustable filaments, which verifies the rationality of the printing parameters chosen. It is concluded from the mechanical property analysis that: 1. The toughness of composite increases significantly with the increase of distance between two adjacent filaments, accompanied by a slight decrease of the strength. 2. The specific strength, toughness and fracture toughness of the epoxy-based composite lattices are greatly improved compared with the solid epoxy-based composite and the cellular composites with only toughening zones. From the fracture surface analysis and finite element modeling, it is concluded that the strength and toughness are simultaneously improved because: 1. The rigid particles prevent the crack propagation inside the composite matrix. 2. The toughening zones effectively prevents the crack growth, which leads to a large amount of energy consumption. 3. The lattice structure can enhance the toughness of the composites, while reducing the density of the composite. In addition, the highly ordered lattice structure can effectively sharing the external deformation by deformation of the unit cells. The strengthening zones have the capability of ensuring the stability of the structure. 4. The larger distance between two adjacent filaments lead to the better deformation ability of the lattice structures, making tunable and predictable mechanical properties possible.Conclusions: In this work, epoxy-based composite lattice was fabricated through one step direct ink writing technique. The specific strength, toughness, and fracture toughness of the resultant composite lattices deliver enhancements of 94.78%, 482%, and 17.4%, respectively, compared with the solid composite. The experimental and finite element analysis show that the toughening zones in the composite lattice can effectively prevent the rapid propagation of the cracks and dissipate the external deformation through the deformation of the lattice structure, and the strengthening zone has the function of ensuring the structural strength and supporting the deformation of the toughening zone. The above synergistic effects make the epoxy-based composite have simultaneously high strength and high toughness. Abstract: Due to the high strength and lightweight, epoxy-based composite have extremely application value in the fields of aerospace and automotive. However, the brittle nature of epoxy resin significantly hindering their application in actual engineering, it is a great challenge to improve the strength and toughness of epoxy-based composite. Herein, we develop an architecture epoxy-based composite lattice with strengthening zones and toughening zones, which are rationally assembled into a layered structure and fabricated by direct ink writing (DIW, a kind of 3D Printing). The physical and chemical properties of epoxy-based composite and filaments were characterized by rotational rheometer and optical microscope, and a universal testing machine were used to test the mechanical properties of epoxy-based composite lattice with different structure. It is indicating that the specific strength, toughness and fracture toughness of epoxy-based composite lattice were increased by 94.78%, 482% and 17.4% compared to solid composite, respectively. From the fracture surfaces and finite element analysis, it can be concluded that the strengthening zones ensure the structural strength, the toughening zones can effectively share the external deformation and prevent the crack propagation. The current research provides a new idea for the design of structural nanocomposites and a theoretical basis for the fabrication and engineering application of high strength and toughness epoxy-based composite.-
Key words:
- epoxy-based composite /
- 3D printing /
- direct ink writing /
- strengthening and toughening /
- lattice
-
图 3 环氧复合材料网格的光学图像: (a) SZ结构, (e) TZ结构(TZ-0.5); (b) TZ-0.4, (c) TZ-0.5, (d) TZ-0.6, (f) ECL-0.4, (g) ECL-0.5, (h) ECL-0.6的截面形貌
Figure 3. Optical images of the epoxy-based composite lattice: (a) SZ structure, (e) TZ-0.5; Cross-sectional view of (b) TZ-0.4, (c) TZ-0.5, (d) TZ-0.6, (f) ECL-0.4, (g) ECL-0.5, (h) ECL-0.6
图 6 不同线间距ECL结构弯曲特性的理论分析: (a) 应力-应变曲线; (b) 应变为1%-5%时线条的旋转角度; (c) ECL-0.4; (d) ECL-0.5; (e) ECL-0.6
Figure 6. Theoretical analysis of flexural properties of ECL structure with different distance between two adjacent filaments: (a) Stress-strain curves; (b) Rotation angle of the filaments at a strain of 1%-5%; (c) ECL-0.4; (d) ECL-0.5; (e) ECL-0.6
表 1 环氧复合材料的材料属性
Table 1. Material properties of epoxy composites
Density/
(tonne·mm−3)Elasticity
Modulus/
MPaPoisson
RatioBrittle Cracking Brittle Shear Direct cracking failure strain Direct stress after
cracking/
MPaDirect
cracking strainShear retention factor Crack
opening strain1.2×10−9 2333 0.35 50 0 1 0 1.8×10−5 0 1.8×10−5 0 1.8×10−5 -
[1] MI X, LIANG N, XU H, et al. Toughness and its mechanisms in epoxy resins[J]. Progress in Materials Science,2022,130:100977. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100977 [2] SRINIVASAN D V, RAVICHANDRAN V, IDAPALAPATI S. Failure analysis of GFRP single lap joints tailored with a combination of tough epoxy and hyperelastic adhesives[J]. Composites Part B,2020,200:108255. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108255 [3] HUNT C J, MORABITO F, GRACE C, et al. A review of composite lattice structures[J]. Composite Structures,2022,284:115120. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115120 [4] NGO T D, KASHANI A, IMBALZANO G, et al. Additive manufacturing (3 D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering,2018,143:172-196. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 [5] KADHIM N, ZAMAN A, JIANG M, et al. A cast-in-place fabrication of high performance epoxy composites cured in an in-situ synthesized 3 D foam of nanofibers[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering,2021,205:108495. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108495 [6] JIA J, SUN X, LIN X, et al. Exceptional electrical conductivity and fracture resistance of 3 D interconnected graphene foam/epoxy composites[J]. ACS nano,2014,8(6):5774-5783. doi: 10.1021/nn500590g [7] CHIANG Y, TUNG C C, LIN X D, et al. Geometrically toughening mechanism of cellular composites inspired by fibonacci lattice in Liquidambar formosana[J]. Composite Structures,2021,262:113349. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113349 [8] SONG W, KONSTANTELLOS G, LI D, et al. Short carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy foams with isotropic cellular structure and anisotropic mechanical response produced from liquid foam templates[J]. Composites Science and Technology,2019,184:107871. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107871 [9] GARCIA C D, SHAHAPURKAR K, DODDAMANI M, et al. Effect of arctic environment on flexural behavior of fly ash cenosphere reinforced epoxy syntactic foams[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering,2018,151:265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.035 [10] HANKS B, BERTHEL J, FRECKER M, et al. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured metal lattice structures: Data review and design interface[J]. Additive Manufacturing,2020,35:101301. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101301 [11] ALBERTINI F, DIRRENBERGER J, SOLLOGOUB C, et al. Experimental and computational analysis of the mechanical properties of composite auxetic lattice structures[J]. Additive Manufacturing,2021,47:102351. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102351 [12] MUELLER J, LEWIS J A, BERTOLDI K. Architected multimaterial lattices with thermally programmable mechanical response[J]. Advanced Functional Materials,2022,32(1):2105128. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105128 [13] ELDER B, NEUPANE R, TOKITA E, et al. Nanomaterial patterning in 3 D printing[J]. Advanced Materials,2020,32(17):1907142. doi: 10.1002/adma.201907142 [14] HUANG T, LIU W, SU C, et al. Dierct ink writing of conductive materials for emerging energy storage systems[J]. Nano Research,2022,15(7):6091-6111. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4200-2 [15] SAADI M A S R, MAGUIRE A, POTTACKAL N T, et al. Direct ink writing: A 3D printing technology for diverse materials[J]. Advanced Materials,2022,34(28):2108855. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108855 [16] COMPTON B G, LEWIS J A. 3 D-printing of lightweight cellular composites[J]. Advanced Materials,2014,26(34):5930-5935. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401804 [17] MUELLER J, RANEY J R, SHEA K, et al. Architected lattices with high stiffness and toughness via multicore–shell 3 D printing[J]. Advanced Materials,2018,30(12):1705001. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705001 [18] CHEN K, ZHANG L, KUANG X, et al. Dynamic photomask-assisted direct ink writing multimaterial for multilevel triboelectric nanogenerator[J]. Advanced Functional Materials,2019,29(33):1903568. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201903568 [19] American Society of Testing Materials. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials: ASTM D790-10[S]. West conshohocken: ASTM International, 2010. [20] American Society of Testing Materials. Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials: ASTM D5045-99[S]. West conshohocken: ASTM International, 1999. [21] 李西敏, 杨韬, 彭必友, 等. 二氧化钛陶瓷浆料的制备及其直写成型3 D打印[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(7):3510-3517.LI Ximin, YANG Tao, PENG Biyou, et al. Preparation of titanium dioxide ceramic slurry and its 3 D printing for direct-ink-writing[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2022,39(7):3510-3517(in Chinese). [22] 范晓龙, 张广成, 李建通, 等. 环氧树脂微孔材料的制备与性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2016, 33(9):1915-1921. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20151123.003FAN Xiaolong, ZHANG Guangcheng, LI Jiantong, et al. Preparation and properties of microcellular epoxy resin[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2016,33(9):1915-1921(in Chinese). doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20151123.003 [23] ULLAS A V, JAISWAL B. Halloysite nanotubes reinforced epoxy- glass microballoons syntactic foams[J]. Composites Communications,2020,21:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.100407 [24] GU H, ZHANG H, MA C, et al. Trace electrosprayed nanopolystyrene facilitated dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Simultaneously strengthening and toughening epoxy[J]. Carbon,2019,142:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.029 [25] ZHANG L, MA J. Effect of coupling agent on mechanical properties of hollow carbon microsphere/phenolic resin syntactic foam[J]. Composites Science and Technology,2010,70:1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.03.016 [26] XU K, LI D, SHANG E, et al. A heating-assisted direct ink writing method for preparation of PDMS cellular structure with high manufacturing fidelity[J]. Polymers,2022,14(7):1323. doi: 10.3390/polym14071323 [27] 徐菁, 李岩, 付昆昆. 仿羊角管状复合材料结构抗冲击性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 40(0):1-12.XU Jing, LI Yan, FU Kunkun. Impact resistance of horn-inspired tubular composite structure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2022,40(0):1-12(in Chinese). [28] GAO G, LI Z, CHANG C. Numerical simulation of diametrical core deformation and fracture induced by core drilling[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,15:0-13. [29] 薛建勋, 孙全平. 氧化锆陶瓷切削加工有限元仿真分析[J]. 中国陶瓷, 2012, 48(10):28-29. doi: 10.16521/j.cnki.issn.1001-9642.2012.10.016XUE Jianxun, SUN Quanping. Finite element simulation analysis of zirconia ceramic cutting[J]. China Ceramics,2012,48(10):28-29(in Chinese). doi: 10.16521/j.cnki.issn.1001-9642.2012.10.016 [30] American Society of Testing Materials. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics: ASTM D638-14[S]. West conshohocken: ASTM International, 2014. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 105
- HTML全文浏览量: 87
- 被引次数: 0