留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

CFRP索阻燃防火措施

朱元林 刘礼华 黄盛彬 朱维军 朱小芳

朱元林, 刘礼华, 黄盛彬, 等. CFRP索阻燃防火措施[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(8): 3786-3793. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210909.007
引用本文: 朱元林, 刘礼华, 黄盛彬, 等. CFRP索阻燃防火措施[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(8): 3786-3793. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210909.007
ZHU Yuanlin, LIU Lihua, HUANG Shengbin, et al. Fire retardant measures of CFRP cable[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(8): 3786-3793. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210909.007
Citation: ZHU Yuanlin, LIU Lihua, HUANG Shengbin, et al. Fire retardant measures of CFRP cable[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(8): 3786-3793. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210909.007

CFRP索阻燃防火措施

doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210909.007
基金项目: 江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2020018);江苏省第五期“333工程”科研资助项目(BRA2019145)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    朱元林,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为先进复合材料结构设计技术  E-mail: zyl0510@hotmail.com

  • 中图分类号: TB330.1

Fire retardant measures of CFRP cable

  • 摘要: 为解决碳纤维增强树脂复合材料(Carbon fiber reinforced polymer,CFRP)索的火灾问题,开发了一种CFRP索的阻燃防火措施。对桥梁缆索用CFRP筋开展高温拉伸试验研究,并比较阻燃防火涂层、石棉、陶瓷纤维布的阻燃防火效果。结果显示,筋材高温剩余强度随温度升高呈线性下降趋势,210℃加热3 h,筋材剩余强度最低为2245.8 MPa,比原始强度下降26.13%;筋材高温加热再冷却后强度会存在一定程度的可逆性恢复,剩余强度均能达到2800 MPa以上,但较原始强度呈略微下降趋势,且加热温度越高,剩余强度越低;通过比较阻燃防火涂层具有较好效果,经2 h灼烧索股聚乙烯(PE)护套,内表面最高温度为206℃;阻燃防火涂层越厚,防护时间越长,刷有2 mm厚度阻燃防火涂层的索股在长达6 h的火焰灼烧下,PE护套内表面最高温度为245℃,PE护套未发生破坏,仅发生软化。研究表明,采用阻燃防火涂层可有效保护CFRP索,火灾2 h内,索股仍可承载,剩余强度>2245 MPa。

     

  • 图  1  碳纤维增强树脂复合材料(CFRP)筋高温拉伸试验

    Figure  1.  High temperature tensile test of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendon

    图  2  不同温度下保温 2 h后的CFRP筋材抗拉强度

    Figure  2.  Tensile strength of CFRP tendons at different temperatures with heat preservation 2 h

    图  3  CFRP筋材高温拉伸破断状态

    Figure  3.  Tensile fracture state of CFRP tendons at high temperature

    图  4  210℃不同保温时间下的CFRP筋材抗拉强度

    Figure  4.  Tensile strength of CFRP tendons with different holding time at 210℃

    图  5  经历不同温度加热2 h冷却后CFRP筋材抗拉强度

    Figure  5.  Tensile strength of CFRP tendons after heating at different temperatures for 2 h and cooling

    图  6  持荷条件下CFRP筋阻燃防火措施对比

    Figure  6.  Comparison on fire retardant measures of CFRP tendons under load conditions

    图  7  CFRP筋材高温下树脂热解(562℃,2 h)

    Figure  7.  Resin pyrolysis of tendons at high temperature (562℃, 2 h)

    图  8  树脂热解后CFRP筋材极限拉伸破断

    Figure  8.  Ultimate tensile fracture of CFRP tendons after resin pyrolysis

    图  9  刷有阻燃防火涂层的CFRP索股

    Figure  9.  CFRP cable strand coated with fire retardant coating

    图  10  阻燃防火涂层遇火焰发泡

    Figure  10.  Fire retardant coating foams when expose to fire

    图  11  无阻燃防火涂层聚乙烯(PE)燃烧

    Figure  11.  Combustion of polyethylene (PE) sheath without fire retardant coating

    图  12  2 mm厚阻燃防火涂层温度-时间曲线

    Figure  12.  Temperature-time curve of 2 mm thickness fire retardant coating

    图  13  CFRP索股测温位置

    Figure  13.  Temperature measurement position of CFRP cable strand

    图  14  CFRP索股不同位置处温度-时间曲线

    Figure  14.  Temperature-time curves at different positions of CFRP cable strand

    图  15  不同厚度阻燃防火涂层的温度-时间曲线

    Figure  15.  Temperature-time curves of fire retardant coating with different thickness

    图  16  2 mm厚度阻燃防火涂层的CFRP索股膨胀发泡过程

    Figure  16.  Intumescent process of CFRP cable strand coated with 2 mm thickness fire retardant coating

    表  1  不同防护类型下CFRP筋材温度及持荷性能

    Table  1.   Temperature and load carrying capacity of CFRP tendons under different protection types

    Protection
    type
    Protection thickness/mmBurning time/minCFRP tendons temperature/℃Stress level/MPaTest resultResident strength/MPa
    2510001170Resin pyrolysis,
    tendon tensile fracture
    Ceramic fiber cloth451205621170Resin pyrolysis,
    tendon is not fracture
    1646
    Asbestos451206351170Resin pyrolysis,
    tendon is not fracture
    1249
    Asbestos601201701170The tendon is not damaged3121
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 刘其伟, 王峰, 徐开顺, 等. 火灾受损桥梁检测评估与加固处理[J]. 公路交通科技, 2005, 22(2):71-74.

    LIU Qiwei, WANG Feng, XU Kaishun, et al. Detection evaluation and repairing of fire damaged bridge[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2005,22(2):71-74(in Chinese).
    [2] 黄清. 钢筋混凝土桥梁火灾后检测评估[J]. 世界桥梁, 2014, 42(5):78-82.

    HUANG Qing. Inspection and evaluation of reinforced concrete bridges after fire disasters[J]. World Bridges,2014,42(5):78-82(in Chinese).
    [3] 张岗, 王亚堃, 王翠娟. 过火混凝土桥梁评价方法及耐久性损伤评估模型[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(S1):88-92.

    ZHANG Gang, WANG Yakun, WANG Cuijuan. Evaluation method and durability damage assessment model for concrete bridge suffered from fire[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2010,27(S1):88-92(in Chinese).
    [4] 杨国龙. 火灾后桥梁拉索性能评估方法研究[J]. 广东土木与建筑, 2012, 2(2):35-37.

    YANG Guolong. Methodology study on performance evaluation of bridge cables after fire[J]. Guangdong Architecture Civil Engineering,2012,2(2):35-37(in Chinese).
    [5] 宁波, 刘永军, 于保阳, 等. 油罐车火灾场景下斜拉桥钢索极限承载力有限元分析[J]. 钢结构, 2012, 27(2):68-72.

    NING Bo, LIU Yongjun, YU Baoyang, et al. Numerical simulation of ultimate bearing capacity of cables for cable-stayed bridge under tanker fire[J]. Steel Construction,2012,27(2):68-72(in Chinese).
    [6] BENNETTS I, MOINUDDIN K. Evaluation of the impact of potential fire scenarios on structural elements of a cable-stayed bridge[J]. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering,2009,19(2):133-150.
    [7] 霍静思, 周子健, 金宝, 等. 钢索燃烧特性和钢绞线高温力学性能试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2017, 34(8):91-97.

    HUO Jingsi, ZHOU Zijian, JIN Bao, et al. Experimental study on combustion performance of steel cable and high temperature mechanical property of steel strand[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2017,34(8):91-97(in Chinese).
    [8] 李艳, 周国华, 王盼. 车辆燃烧下大跨径悬索桥主缆高温力学性能研究[J]. 西部交通科技, 2018(1): 145-149, 189.

    LI Yan, ZHOU Guohua, WANG Pan. Research on high-temperature mechanical properties of main cables of large-span[J]. Western China Communication Science & Technology, 2018(1): 145-149, 189(in Chinese).
    [9] KODUR V, YU B. Evaluating the fire response of concrete beams strengthened with near-surface-mounted FRP reinforcement[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2013,17(4):517-529.
    [10] YU B, KODUR V. Effect of temperature on strength and stiffness properties of near-surface mounted FRP reinforcement[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering,2014,58:510-517.
    [11] 付成龙, 陈利, 张雅璐. 几何尺寸与温度对CFRP 筋材力学性能的影响[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2016(5): 74-79.

    FU Chenglong, CHEN Li, ZHANG Yalu. Evaluation of geometrical size and temperature effect on the mechanical behavior of CFRP bars[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Compo-sites , 2016(5): 74-79(in Chinese).
    [12] 方志, 方川, 蒋正文, 等. 高温后CFRP 筋及其粘结式锚固系统的力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2021, 38(12):4031-4041.

    FANG Zhi, FANG Chuan, JIANG Zhengwen, et al. Mecha-nical properties of CFRP bar and bond-type anchorage system after elevated temperature exposure[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2021,38(12):4031-4041(in Chinese).
    [13] 李艳, 汪剑, 周国华. 大跨径悬索桥缆索体系抗火设计研究[J]. 公路, 2018 , 63(5): 94-101.

    LI Yan, WANG Jian, ZHOU Guohua. Research on fire resis-tance design of cable system for long-span suspension bridge[J]. Highway, 2018, 63(5): 94-101(in Chinese).
    [14] 张凯, 王小伟, 黎健, 等. 带砂浆包覆层CFRP 筋高温后力学性能研究[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2017, 43(2): 38-41.

    ZHANG Kai, WANG Xiaowei, LI Jian, et al. Study on high temperature performance of CFRP bars covered with cladding layer[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2017, 43(2): 38-41(in Chinese).
    [15] 徐玉林, 诸葛萍, 孙莉莉, 等. 桥梁CFRP 缆索外包陶瓷纤维的防火性能研究[J]. 宁波大学学报(理工版), 2019, 32(2): 91-96.

    XU Yulin, ZHU Geping, SUN Lili, et al. Fire safety of CFRP cable system under the bridge fire[J]. Journal of Ningbo University (NSEE), 2019, 32(2): 91-96(in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1234
  • HTML全文浏览量:  495
  • PDF下载量:  63
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-14
  • 修回日期:  2021-08-24
  • 录用日期:  2021-08-24
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-09-09
  • 刊出日期:  2022-08-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回