变电站/换流站防火密封材料评价体系优化与硅酮/丙烯酸类产品性能对比研究

Optimization of Fireproof Sealing Material Evaluation Systems in Substations and Converter Stations with Comparative Performance Analysis of Silicone and Acrylic-Based Materials

  • 摘要: 在新型电力系统快速发展与负荷攀升的背景下,提升变电站(换流站)消防能力成为保障能源设施安全的关键。防火密封材料的热稳定性与阻燃性能直接影响电力设备的安全运行可靠性。本文聚焦当前材料组分—性能关联不清、工程适用性评价不足等问题,系统研究了国内外硅酮基(1#、3#)与丙烯酸基(2#、4#)四类典型产品的多尺度性能。通过微观结构表征与热性能、防火性能及力学性能测试的综合评价,揭示了材料组成与性能的耦合关系。结果表明:国产硅酮材料3#因高含量复配无机填料(Al2O3、TiO2、ZnO)及有机—无机互穿结构,综合性能最优,残炭率50.9%、极限氧指数48%,拉伸强度1.80 MPa且零收缩,满足UL-94 V-0级阻燃要求。国外硅酮材料1#初始热解温度高(363.7 ℃),但力学性能较3#低31.2%,防火性能不足。丙烯酸基材料2#与4#热稳定性较差,初始热降解温度分别为276.7 ℃与177.2 ℃,其中2#易燃(LOI~22%),4#虽防火性能较好(LOI~36%),但含超标As元素(22.6 ppm)且收缩显著,限制其工程应用。综上,国产硅酮类材料3#表现出最优的综合性能,可满足国网电力设备工程应用需求。本研究有望为电力设备防火材料选型提供科学依据,具有重要工程价值。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of rapid development of new power systems and increasing load, enhancing the fire protection capability of substations (converter stations) has become crucial for ensuring the safety of energy facilities. The thermal stability and flame retardancy of fireproof sealing materials directly impact the safe and reliable operation of power equipment. Focusing on current issues such as unclear composition-property relationships and insufficient evaluation of engineering applicability, this study systematically investigates the multi-scale performance of four typical types of products, including silicone-based (1#, 3#) and acrylic-based (2#, 4#) materials, both domestically and internationally. Through comprehensive evaluation combining microstructural characterization with tests on thermal, fire resistance, and mechanical properties, the coupling relationship between material composition and performance is revealed. The results show that the domestic silicone-based material 3# exhibits the best overall performance due to its high content of compounded inorganic fillers (Al2O3、TiO2、ZnO) and an organic-inorganic interpenetrating structure, with a char residue of 50.9%, limiting oxygen index of 48%, tensile strength of 1.80 MPa, and zero shrinkage, meeting the UL-94 V-0 flame retardancy requirement. The foreign silicone-based material 1# has a high initial pyrolysis temperature (363.7℃) but its mechanical performance is 31.2% lower than that of 3#, with insufficient fire resistance. The acrylic-based materials 2# and 4# exhibit poor thermal stability, with initial thermal degradation temperatures of 276.7℃ and 177.2℃, respectively. Material 2# is flammable (LOI ~22%), while material 4#, although having better fire resistance (LOI ~36%), contains excessive As element (22.6 ppm) and exhibits significant shrinkage, limiting its engineering application. In summary, the domestic silicone-based material 3# demonstrates the best overall performance and can meet the engineering application requirements of State Grid power equipment. This study is expected to provide a scientific basis for the selection of fireproof materials in power equipment, offering significant engineering value.

     

/

返回文章
返回