Preparation and performance of PVDF/PPy flexible DC nano-generator
-
摘要: 针对传统纳米发电机为交流输出,仍需采用外部整流器进行直流转化而导致的难以高度集成、柔性化和较低的功率密度问题,本文将聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)静电纺膜作为基底,在其表面气相聚合聚吡咯(PPy),制得PVDF/PPy复合纳米纤维膜,并依据肖特基整流原理,以该复合纳米纤维膜构建直流纳米发电机。研究了不同聚合时间下氧化剂浓度对PVDF/PPy复合纳米纤维膜形貌和直流纳米发电机机电性能的影响。结果表明:当氧化剂浓度为2.0 mol/L,聚合时间为90 min时,电输出性能最优,对应峰值电压输出为1.23 V,峰值电流输出为210.55 μA,理论功率密度达到28.77 μW/cm2。本项研究展示的PVDF/PPy直流纳米发电机,其能源转换机制源于压电高分子的压电效应和肖特基结的整流效应。该类直流纳米发电机具备柔韧、集成式和自整流的特征,可灵活用于各种场所,直接为电子设备提供电能。Abstract: To address the difficulty of high integration, flexibility and low power density caused by the traditional nanogenerators with alternating current (AC) output and still need to use external rectifiers for direct current (DC) conversion, in this paper, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) electrostatically spun film was used as a substrate and polypyrrole (PPy) was gas-phase polymerized on the surface of the film to produce a composite nanofibrous film of PVDF/PPy, and based on the Schottky collation principle, a DC nanogenerator was constructed by this composite nanofibrous film. The composite nanofiber membrane was used to construct a DC nano-generator based on Schottky finishing principle. The effects of oxidant concentration on the morphology of PVDF/PPy composite nanofiber membrane and the electromechanical performance of DC nano-generator were investigated under different polymerization time. The results show that when the oxidant concentration is 2 mol/L and the polymerization time is 90 min, the electrical output performance is optimal, corresponding to a peak voltage output of 1.23 V, a peak current output of 210.55 μA, and a theoretical power density of 28.77 μW/cm2. In this study, this PVDF/PPy DC nano-generator was demonstrated, and the energy conversion mechanism originates from the piezoelectric effect of piezoelectric polymer and the rectification effect of Schottky junction. These DC nano-generators are flexible, integrated and self-rectifying, and can be flexibly used in various places to provide power directly to electronic devices.
-
Key words:
- nano-generator /
- piezoelectric polymer /
- Schottky junction /
- PVDF /
- PPy
-
图 1 聚偏氟乙烯/聚吡咯(PVDF/PPy)直流纳米发电机的制备及测试示意图:(a) PVDF 纳米纤维膜的制备;(b) 气相合成 PPy;(c) PVDF/PPy 直流(DC)纳米发电机;(d) 机电测试仪
Py—Pyrrole
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparation and test of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(pyrrole) (PVDF/PPy) DC nano-generator: (a) Preparing PVDF nanofiber membrane; (b) Gas phase polymerization of PPy; (c) PVDF/PPy direct current (DC) nano-generator; (d) Electromechanical performance testing equipment
图 2 纺丝流量对 PVDF 纳米纤维膜形貌的影响(纺丝时间为 5 h):(a) 0.6 mL/h;(b) 0.7 mL/h;(c) 0.8 mL/h;(d) 0.9 mL/h;(e) 1.0 mL/h;(f) 纺丝流量对纤维直径的影响
Figure 2. Effect of spinning flow rate on microstructure of PVDF nanofiber membrane (Spinning time is 5 h): (a) 0.6 mL/h; (b) 0.7 mL/h; (c) 0.8 mL/h; (d) 0.9 mL/h; (e) 1.0 mL/h; (f) Effect of spinning flow-rate on fiber diameter
图 4 氧化剂浓度0.5 mol/L (a)、1.0 mol/L (b)、1.5 mol/L (c)、2.0 mol/L (d)、2.5 mol/L (e)和聚合时间(f)对 PVDF/PPy 复合纳米纤维膜形貌及电阻的影响
Figure 4. Effect of oxidant concentration 0.5 mol/L (a), 1.0 mol/L (b), 1.5 mol/L (c), 2.0 mol/L (d), 2.5 mol/L (e) and polymerization time (f) on the microstructure and resistance of PVDF/PPy composite nanofiber membranes
图 5 不同聚合时间下氧化剂浓度对 PVDF/PPy 纳米发电机电压输出的影响:(a) 30 min;(b) 60 min;(c) 90 min;(d) 120 min;(e) 150 min;(f) 聚合时间为 90 min 时不同氧化剂浓度下的电流-电压(I-V)曲线
Figure 5. Effect of oxidant concentration on voltage of the PVDF/PPy nano-generator under different polymerization time: (a) 30 min; (b) 60 min; (c) 90 min; (d) 120 min; (e) 150 min; (f) Current-voltage (I-V) curves under different oxidation concentrations at polymerization time of 90 min
图 6 不同聚合时间下氧化剂浓度对PVDF/PPy纳米发电机电流输出的影响:(a) 30 min;(b) 60 min;(c) 90 min;(d) 120 min;(e) 150 min;(f) 聚合时间为90 min时不同氧化剂浓度下的电荷积累
Figure 6. Effect of oxidant concentration on current of the PVDF/PPy nano-generator at different polymerization time: (a) 30 min; (b) 60 min; (c) 90 min; (d) 120 min; (e) 150 min; (f) Charge accumulation under different oxidation concentrations at polymerization time of 90 min
图 8 PVDF/PPy 器件机制和性能:(a) 肖特基接触示意图及肖特基势垒和内建电场;(b) 不同电极的I-V曲线;(c) Al/PVDF/PPy/Cu器件示意图(氧化剂浓度 2 mol/L,聚合时间 90 min)、输出电压(d)和输出电流(e);(f) 组合器件Al/PVDF/PPy/Cu/PVDF/Cu示意图及电压输出(g)和电流输出(h);(i) 组合器件Cu/PVDF/Al/PVDF/PPy/Cu示意图及电压输出(j)和电流输出(k)
Figure 8. Mechanism and performance of PVDF/PPy devices: (a) Schottky contact schematic diagram, with an enlarged view showing Schottky barrier and built-in electric field; (b) I-V curves of different electrodes; Schematic diagram of PVDF/PPy device (Oxidant concentration 2 mol/L, polymerization time 90 min) (c), output voltage (d) and output current (e); Schematic diagram of the combined device Al/PVDF/PPy/Cu/PVDF/Cu (f) and output voltage (g) and output current (h); Schematic diagram of combined device Cu/PVDF/Al/PVDF/PPy/Cu (i) and output voltage (j) and output current (k)
ε—Built-in electric field; EFM—Fermi energy levels of metals; EFS—Fermi energy levels for semiconductors; EC—Conduction zone bottom energy level; EV—Valence band top energy level
表 1 直流纳米发电机的机电性能
Table 1. Electromechanical performance of DC nano-generator
Device configuration Output voltage/V Current density/(μA·cm−2) Theoretical power/(μW·cm−2) Ref. Au/PPy/Al 0.7 218.6 153.02 [25] Al/PEDOT:PSS 0.8 73(0.73 A/m2) 58.4 [26] ZnO NWs/Pt 0.01 8.33(500 nA, 2 mm×3 mm) 0.08 [35] Au/ZnO/Cu 0.3 3.11(7 μA, 2.25 cm2) 0.93 [36] Au/ZnO-PAN/ZnO-Cu 1.6 7.2 11.52 [36] Au/PANI/Al 0.6 (80.5 μA) — [37] Cu/PANI/Ag 3.5 (800 μA) — [37] Au/PPy-DMSO/Al 0.88 105.9 93.19 [38] Au/PPy/Al 0.67 6.35(8.45 μA, 1.33 cm2) 4.25 [38] PANI-coated fabric/PVDF 3.2 3.77 12.06 [39] Al/PEDOT coating 0.45 2.5(2.5 μA, 1 cm2) 1.13 [40] Cu/PVDF-PPy/Al 1.23 23.39(210.55 μA, 9 cm2) 28.77 This work Notes: PEDOT:PSS—Poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate; NWs—Nanowires; PAN—Polyacrylonitrile; PANI—Polyaniline; DMSO—Dimethyl sulfoxide. -
[1] GUAN X Y, XU B G, WU M J, et al. Breathable, washable and wearable woven-structured triboelectric nanogenerators utilizing electrospun nanofibers for biomechanical energy harvesting and self-powered sensing[J]. Nano Energy, 2021, 80: 105549. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105549 [2] LIU H C, ZHONG J W, LEE C K, et al. A comprehensive review on piezoelectric energy harvesting technology: Materials, mechanisms, and applications[J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2018, 5(4): 041306. doi: 10.1063/1.5074184 [3] FU X P, BU T Z, LI C L, et al. Overview of micro/nano-wind energy harvesters and sensors[J]. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(47): 23929-23944. doi: 10.1039/D0NR06373H [4] SAHOO S, WALKE P, NAYAK S K, et al. Recent developments in self-powered smart chemical sensors for wearable electronics[J]. Nano Research, 2021, 14(11): 3669-3689. doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3330-8 [5] WANG Z L, SONG J H. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5771): 242-246. doi: 10.1126/science.1124005 [6] FAN F R, TIAN Z Q, WANG Z L. Flexible triboelectric generator[J]. Nano Energy, 2012, 1(2): 328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004 [7] YANG R S, QIN Y, DAI L M, et al. Power generation with laterally packaged piezoelectric fine wires[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2009, 4(1): 34-39. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.314 [8] DONG L, CLOSSON A B, JIN C R, et al. Vibration-energy-harvesting system: Transduction mechanisms, frequency tuning techniques, and biomechanical applications[J]. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2019, 4(10): 1900177. doi: 10.1002/admt.201900177 [9] SIDDIQUE A R M, MAHMUD S, VAN HEYST B. A comprehensive review on vibration based micro power generators using electromagnetic and piezoelectric transducer mechanisms[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 106: 728-747. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.071 [10] HU D W, YAO M G, FAN Y, et al. Strategies to achieve high performance piezoelectric nanogenerators[J]. Nano Energy, 2019, 55: 288-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.053 [11] DENG W L, ZHOU Y H, LIBANORI A, et al. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for personalized healthcare[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2022, 51(9): 3380-3435. [12] SEZER N, KOÇ M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting[J]. Nano Energy, 2021, 80: 105567. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105567 [13] ZHU G, PAN C F, GUO W X, et al. Triboelectric-generator-driven pulse electrodeposition for micropatterning[J]. Nano Letters, 2012, 12(9): 4960-4965. doi: 10.1021/nl302560k [14] WANG Y F, JIN X, WANG W Y, et al. Efficient triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) output management for improving charge density and reducing charge loss[J]. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2021, 3(2): 532-549. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.0c00890 [15] KIM W G, KIM D W, TCHO I W, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerator: Structure, mechanism, and applications[J]. ACS Nano, 2021, 15(1): 258-287. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c09803 [16] SONG Y D, WANG N, WANG Y H, et al. Direct current triboelectric nanogenerators[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(45): 2002756. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002756 [17] JIANG X N, HUANG W B, ZHANG S J. Flexoelectric nano-generator: Materials, structures and devices[J]. Nano Energy, 2013, 2(6): 1079-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.09.001 [18] TRIPATHY A, SARAVANAKUMAR B, MOHANTY S, et al. Comprehensive review on flexoelectric energy harvesting technology: Mechanisms, device configurations, and potential applications[J]. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2021, 3(7): 2898-2924. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.1c00267 [19] CHANDRASEKARAN S, BOWEN C, ROSCOW J, et al. Micro-scale to nano-scale generators for energy harvesting: Self powered piezoelectric, triboelectric and hybrid devices[J]. Physics Reports, 2019, 792: 1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001 [20] XIE L J, ZHAI N N, LIU Y N, et al. Hybrid triboelectric nanogenerators: From energy complementation to integration[J]. Research, 2021, 2021: 9143762. [21] VIDAL J V, SLABOV V, KHOLKIN A L, et al. Hybrid triboelectric-electromagnetic nanogenerators for mechanical energy harvesting: A review[J]. Nano-Micro Letters, 2021, 13(1): 1-58. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00525-y [22] SRIPHAN S, VITTAYAKORN N. Hybrid piezoelectric-triboelectric nanogenerators for flexible electronics: Recent advances and perspectives[J]. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 2022, 7(3): 100461. [23] WANG W Y, ZHENG Y D, JIN X, et al. Unexpectedly high piezoelectricity of electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes[J]. Nano Energy, 2019, 56: 588-594. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.082 [24] YE L L, CHEN L Y, YU J L, et al. High-performance piezoelectric nanogenerator based on electrospun ZnO nanorods/P(VDF-TrFE) composite membranes for energy harvesting application[J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2021, 32(4): 3966-3978. doi: 10.1007/s10854-020-05138-0 [25] SHAO H, FANG J A, WANG H X, et al. Polymer-metal Schottky contact with direct-current outputs[J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(7): 1461-1466. doi: 10.1002/adma.201504778 [26] YANG R Z, BENNER M, GUO Z P, et al. High-performance flexible Schottky DC generator via metal/conducting polymer sliding contacts[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(43): 2103132. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202103132 [27] 孙丽颖, 钱建华, 赵永芳. AgNWs-TPU/PVDF 柔性薄膜电容传感器的制备和性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(6): 441-448.SUN Liying, QIAN Jianhua, ZHAO Yongfang. Preparation and performance of AgNWs-TPU/PVDF flexible film capacitance sensors[J]. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2021, 35(6): 441-448(in Chinese). [28] LU L J, DING W Q, LIU J Q, et al. Flexible PVDF based piezoelectric nanogenerators[J]. Nano Energy, 2020, 78: 105251. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105251 [29] KHURANA V, KISANNAGAR R R, DOMALA S S, et al. In situ polarized ultrathin PVDF film-based flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators[J]. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2020, 2(10): 3409-3417. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.0c00667 [30] RANA M M, KHAN A A, HUANG G G, et al. Porosity modulated high-performance piezoelectric nanogenerator based on organic/inorganic nanomaterials for self-powered structural health monitoring[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(42): 47503-47512. [31] 薛优, 杨涛, 王宏洋, 等. 基于静电纺丝法原位极化 PVDF 纳米纤维薄膜构建高效压电纳米发电机[J]. 工程科学学报, 2023, 45(7): 1156-1164. doi: 10.3321/j.issn.1001-053X.2022.1.bjkjdxxb202201001XUE You, YANG Tao, WANG Hongyang, et al. Construction of a high-efficiency piezoelectric nanogenerator based on in situ polarization of PVDF nanofiber films by electrospinning[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2023, 45(7): 1156-1164(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn.1001-053X.2022.1.bjkjdxxb202201001 [32] 纪辉. 纱线应力传感器的制备与性能研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉纺织大学, 2020.JI Hui. Preparation and properties of wearable strain fabric sensors[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Textile University, 2020(in Chinese). [33] FANG J, WANG X G, LIN T. Electrical power generator from randomly oriented electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofibre membranes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, 21(30): 11088-11091. doi: 10.1039/c1jm11445j [34] BRISCOE J, STEWART M, VOPSON M, et al. Nanostructured p-n junctions for kinetic-to-electrical energy conversion[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2012, 2(10): 1261-1268. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201200205 [35] LIU J, FEI P, ZHOU J, et al. Toward high output-power nanogenerator[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 92(17): 173105. doi: 10.1063/1.2918840 [36] SUN Y, ZHENG Y D, WANG R, et al. Direct-current piezoelectric nanogenerator based on two-layer zinc oxide nanorod arrays with equal c-axis orientation for energy harvesting[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 426: 131262. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131262 [37] MENG Y F, ZHANG L, XU G Y, et al. Direct-current generators based on conductive polymers for self-powered flexible devices[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 20258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99447-x [38] DING X A, SHAO H, WANG H X, et al. Effect of water and DMSO on mechanoelectrical conversion of Schottky DC generators[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022, 10(24): 13055-13065. doi: 10.1039/D2TA02213C [39] HAN X, NIU J R, WANG Y F, et al. Polyaniline-based Schottky-triboelectric hybrid DC generators with tunable electrical outputs[J]. Nano Energy, 2022, 104: 107956. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107956 [40] MENG J A, GUO Z H, PAN C X, et al. Flexible textile direct-current generator based on the tribovoltaic effect at dynamic metal-semiconducting polymer interfaces[J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2021, 6(7): 2442-2450. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00288 [41] DING X, SHAO H, WANG H X, et al. Schottky DC generators with considerable enhanced power output and energy conversion efficiency based on polypyrrole-TiO2 nanocomposite[J]. Nano Energy, 2021, 89: 106367. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106367 [42] ABTHAGIR P S, SARASWATHI R. Junction properties of metal/polypyrrole Schottky barriers[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2001, 81(9): 2127-2135. doi: 10.1002/app.1648 [43] BOUTRY C M, MÜLLER M, HIEROLD C. Junctions between metals and blends of conducting and biodegradable polymers (PLLA-PPy and PCL-PPy)[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2012, 32(6): 1610-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.051