Technology status and research trend of low-ice-adhesion anti-icing andde-icing coatings
-
摘要: 结冰是一种常见的自然现象,冰的形成和堆积会给航空航天、舰船交通、电力系统、能源设施等带来许多安全问题。研究防/除冰材料及技术,提升防御结冰灾害的应对能力,对日常生活、工业生产、国防军工等具有重要意义。低冰粘附防/除冰涂层利用材料本身的性能显著降低冰与表面的粘附力,使冰在风力或自重作用下脱离,具有广阔的发展前景。本文首先介绍了冰的形成原理和结冰类型。随后,从纳米、微米等不同尺度总结分析了低冰粘附防/除冰涂层理论模拟方面的研究进展。根据降低冰粘附机制的不同,分别介绍了超疏水涂层、润滑表面涂层、低模量弹性体涂层、应力集中诱发裂纹涂层、低界面韧性涂层等不同类型涂层的除冰机制和制备方法。综述了冰粘附性的评价指标和实验方法,阐述了各种冰粘附强度测试方法的优缺点。最后,展望了低冰粘附防/除冰涂层未来的研究方向。Abstract: Icing is universal in nature, whose formation and accumulation can cause many safety problems to aerospace, naval transportation, electric power systems, energy facilities etc. Research on anti-icing and de-icing materials and technologies to enhance the ability to respond to ice disasters is of great significance to daily life, industrial production, and national defense and military industry. Low-ice-adhesion anti-icing and de-icing coatings have a promising future as they can significantly reduce the ice adhesion on surface through the properties of themselves, allowing ice to be removed by wind or gravity. In this paper, first, the principles of formation and classification of ice were introduced. Secondly, the research progress of theoretical simulation of low-ice-adhesion anti-icing and de-icing coatings was summarized through different length scales, such as nano and micrometers. After that, different types of coatings, like superhydrophobic coatings, liquid-infused surface coatings, low modulus elastomer coatings, macro-crack initiator coatings and low-interfacial-toughness coatings, were introduced by different mechanisms of reducing ice adhesion, focusing on the de-icing mechanisms and preparation methods. What's more, the evaluation indicators and test methods of ice adhesion were reviewed in this paper, and the advantages and disadvantages of various ice adhesion strength test methods were expounded. Finally, some prospect for the future of low-ice-adhesion anti-icing and de-icing coatings was given by this paper.
-
图 5 超疏水涂层的未来发展方向:(a)装甲超疏水涂层[76];(b)自修复超疏水涂层[77];(c)自相似超疏水涂层[78];(d)光热超疏水涂层[44];(e)层次结构超疏水涂层[83];(f)凹入结构超疏水涂层[87]
CA—Contact angle
Figure 5. Future of superhydrophobic coatings: (a) Armored superhydrophobic coatings[76]; (b) Self-healing superhydrophobic coatings[77]; (c) Self-similar superhydrophobic coatings[78]; (d) Photothermal superhydrophobic coatings[44]; (e) Hierarchical superhydrophobic coatings[83]; (f) Re-entrant superhydrophobic coatings[87]
图 6 润滑表面涂层的未来发展方向:(a)光热润滑表面涂层[46];(b)自修复润滑表面涂层[101];(c)超疏水-润滑表面(SHS & LIS)可切换涂层[102];(d)相变材料复合润滑表面涂层[103];(e)表面纹理优化[105];(f)液膜生成润滑表面涂层[106];(g)界面滑移润滑表面涂层[107]
PSSS—Photothermal solid slippery surface; CNT—Carbon nanotube; SLIPS—Slippery liquid infused porous surfaces; PTSLIPS—Phase transformable slippery liquid infused porous surfaces; LLG—Liquid layer generators
Figure 6. Future of liquid-infused surface coatings: (a) Photothermal lubricated surface coatings[46]; (b) Self-healing lubricated surface coatings[101];(c) Superhydrophobic-lubricated surface (SHS & LIS) switchable coatings[102]; (d) Phase-change-material composite lubricated surface coatings[103]; (e) Optimized surface texture[105]; (f) Liquid-film-generation lubricated surface coatings[106]; (g) Interfacial-slippage lubricated surface coatings[107]
图 8 应力集中诱发裂纹涂层的未来发展方向:(a)断裂可控表面[51];(b)超疏水复合应力集中诱发裂纹涂层[124];(c)润滑表面复合应力集中诱发裂纹涂层[68]
PU—Polyurethane; RTV-1—Single-component room temperature vulcanized silicone rubber; R—Radius of water droplets; Rc—Critical size of ice nucleation; SL—Solid lubricant; LL—Liquid lubricant; E51-EP—E51 epoxy resin; α, ω-PDMS—α, ω-polysiloxane; IPN—Interpenetrating polymer network; F-SIDI—Fracture-promoted ultraslippery ice detachment interface; F—Shear force; m—Mass; g—Gravitational acceleration
Figure 8. Future of stress-located crack initiator coatings: (a) Fracture-controlled surfaces[51]; (b) Superhydrophobic-composited stress-located crack initiator coatings[124]; (c) Lubricated-surface-composited stress-located crack initiator coatings[68]
图 9 低界面韧性涂层的未来发展方向:(a)新型低界面韧性涂层[66];(b)主动除冰复合低界面韧性涂层[15];(c)低界面韧性涂层的影响因素[128];(d)低界面韧性涂层的改性[127]
SRR—Split ring resonator; H, λ—Amplitude and wavelength of surface roughness; β—Shielding factor; PVC—Polyvinyl chloride
Figure 9. Future of low-interfacial-toughness coatings: (a) New low-interfacial-toughness coatings[66]; (b) Active-methods-composited low-interfacial-toughness coatings[15]; (c) Factors affecting low-interfacial-toughness coatings[128]; (d) Modification of low-interfacial-toughness coatings[127]
图 10 试样级冰粘附测试方法:(a)拉伸实验[27];(b)离心实验[133];(c)零度锥实验[54];(d)推离实验[134]
P—Pressure; c—Length; D—Diameter; LVDT—Linear variable displacement transducer; a—Thickness
Figure 10. Sample-oriented test method for ice adhesion strength: (a) Tensile test[27]; (b) Centrifugation test[133]; (c) Zero-degree cone test[54]; (d) Push-off test[134]
表 1 目前的低冰粘附防/除冰涂层
Table 1. Low-ice-adhesion anti-icing and de-icing coatings
Type De-icing mechanism Advantage and disadvantage Superhydrophobic coatings Low surface energy;
Low actual contact areaConsidered to be the ideal anti-icing and de-icing strategy, significantly reduce ice adhesion;
Poor durability, not resistant to low temperature and high humidity environmentLubricated surface coatings Lubricating liquid film insulating the ice and the surface Significantly reduce the ice adhesion;
Severe wear, poor durability, and regular maintenance requiredLow-modulus elastomer coatings The reduction of shear modulus induces interface cavitation and crack initiation Extremely low adhesion of ice;
Poor durabilityStress-located crack initiator coatings The stress concentration induces uneven deformation and cracks Extremely low adhesion of ice;
Poor durabilityLow-interfacial-toughness coatings Reducing interfacial toughness promotes large-scale de-icing Suitable for large area de-icing;
Poor durability, high cost, complex manufacturing -
[1] TUTEJA A, CHOI W, MA M, et al. Designing superoleophobic surfaces[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5856): 1618-1622. doi: 10.1126/science.1148326 [2] HU H, GAO L, LIU Y. Chapter 1—Introduction[M]//HU H, GAO L, LIU Y. Wind turbine icing physics and anti-/de-icing technology. United Kingdom: Academic Press, 2022: 1-16. [3] 张义昌. 斜拉桥覆冰拉索风致振动分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021.ZHANG Yichang. Analysis of wind-induced vibration of ice-covered cable of cable-stayed bridge[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2021(in Chinese). [4] KLAUS G S, HANS J K, JÜRGEN K, et al . Thermal design and de-icing system for the Antarctic Telescope ICE-T[C]. Proc. SPIE 7733, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III, 77331W, 2010. [5] LYU J, SONG Y, JIANG L, et al. Bio-inspired strategies for anti-icing[J]. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(4): 3152-3169. doi: 10.1021/nn406522n [6] LI Q Z, GUO L, SHU Z L, et al. On-line anti-icing technology for catenary of electrified railway[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(10): 46-51. [7] WONG T S, KANG S H, TANG S K Y, et al. Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity[J]. Nature, 2011, 477(7365): 443-447. doi: 10.1038/nature10447 [8] 谢强, 陈海龙, 章继峰. 极地航行船舶及海洋平台防冰和除冰技术研究进展[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2017, 12(1): 45-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.01.008XIE Qiang, CHEN Hailong, ZHANG Jifeng. Research progress of anti-icing/deicing technologies for polar ships and offshore platforms[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(1): 45-53(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.01.008 [9] PETRENKO V F, PENG S. Reduction of ice adhesion to metal by using self-assembling monolayers (SAMs)[J]. Canadian Journal of Physics, 2003, 81(1-2): 387-393. doi: 10.1139/p03-014 [10] HURÉ M, OLIVIER P, GARCIA J. Effect of Cassie-Baxter versus Wenzel states on ice adhesion: A fracture toughness approach[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2022, 194: 103440. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103440 [11] MAKKONEN L. Ice adhesion—Theory, measurements and counter measures[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2012, 26(4-5): 413-445. doi: 10.1163/016942411X574583 [12] 戴海军, 李嘉禄, 孙颖, 等. 纬编双轴向织物/环氧树脂电加热复合材料电热及层间剪切性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2020, 37(8): 1997-2004. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20191129.001DAI Haijun, LI Jialu, SUN Ying, et al. Electrothermal and interlaminar shear properties of weft knitted biaxial fabric/epoxy resin electrically heated composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2020, 37(8): 1997-2004(in Chinese). doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20191129.001 [13] MOHAMMADIAN B, NAMDARI N, ABOU YASSINE A H, et al. Interfacial phenomena in snow from its formation to accumulation and shedding[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 294: 102480. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102480 [14] SHEN Y, WU X, TAO J, et al. Icephobic materials: Fundamentals, performance evaluation, and applications[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2019, 103: 509-557. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.03.004 [15] AZIMI DIJVEJIN Z, JAIN M C, KOZAK R, et al. Smart low interfacial toughness coatings for on-demand de-icing without melting[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 5119. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32852-6 [16] YU Y, CHEN L, WENG D, et al. A promising self-assembly PTFE coating for effective large-scale deicing[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 147: 105732. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105732 [17] SCHUTZIUS T M, JUNG S, MAITRA T, et al. Physics of icing and rational design of surfaces with extraordinary icephobicity[J]. Langmuir, 2015, 31(17): 4807-4821. doi: 10.1021/la502586a [18] LIU J, ZHU C, LIU K, et al. Distinct ice patterns on solid surfaces with various wettabilities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(43): 11285-11290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712829114 [19] SEAR R P. Nucleation: Theory and applications to protein solutions and colloidal suspensions[J]. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19(3): 033101. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/3/033101 [20] ZHANG Z, LIU X Y. Control of ice nucleation: Freezing and antifreeze strategies[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2018, 47(18): 7116-7139. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00626A [21] LIU X Y, DU N. Zero-sized effect of nano-particles and inverse homogeneous nucleation: Principles of freezing and antifreeze[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004, 279(7): 6124-6131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310487200 [22] FLETCHER N H. Size effect in heterogeneous nucleation[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1958, 29(3): 572-576. doi: 10.1063/1.1744540 [23] BEN-JACOB E, GARIK P. The formation of patterns in non-equilibrium growth[J]. Nature, 1990, 343(6258): 523-530. doi: 10.1038/343523a0 [24] GRAEBER G, SCHUTZIUS T M, EGHLIDI H, et al. Spontaneous self-dislodging of freezing water droplets and the role of wettability[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(42): 11040-11045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705952114 [25] DHYANI A, CHOI W, GOLOVIN K, et al. Surface design strategies for mitigating ice and snow accretion[J]. Matter, 2022, 5(5): 1423-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.04.012 [26] Corps of Engineers Washington DC. Ice engineering, EM-1110-2-1612[R]. Washington: Corps of Engineers Washington DC, 1999. [27] WORK A, LIAN Y. A critical review of the measurement of ice adhesion to solid substrates[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2018, 98: 1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.001 [28] SOJOUDI H, WANG M, BOSCHER N D, et al. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: Similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Soft Matter, 2016, 12(7): 1938-1963. doi: 10.1039/C5SM02295A [29] RØNNEBERG S, LAFORTE C, VOLAT C, et al. The effect of ice type on ice adhesion[J]. AIP Advances, 2019, 9(5): 55304. [30] LØSET S, SHKHINEK K N, GUDMESTAD O T, et al. Actions from ice on Arctic offshore and coastal structures[M]. St Petersburg: Издательство Лань, 2006: 194. [31] ZHANG Z, ZHANG H, YUE S, et al. A review of icing and anti-icing technology for transmission lines[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(2): 601. doi: 10.3390/en16020601 [32] HEIL J, MOHAMMADIAN B, SARAYLOO M, et al. Relationships between surface properties and snow adhesion and its shedding mechanisms[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(16): 5407. doi: 10.3390/app10165407 [33] SUN X, DAMLE V G, LIU S, et al. Bioinspired stimuli-responsive and antifreeze-secreting anti-icing coatings[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2015, 2(5): 1400479. doi: 10.1002/admi.201400479 [34] NIHONYANAGI S, YAMAGUCHI S, TAHARA T. Water hydrogen bond structure near highly charged interfaces is not like ice[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(20): 6867-6869. doi: 10.1021/ja910914g [35] XIAO S, HE J, ZHANG Z. Modeling nanoscale ice adhesion[J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2017, 30: 224-226. doi: 10.1016/j.camss.2017.05.001 [36] XIAO S, SKALLERUD B H, WANG F, et al. Enabling sequential rupture for lowering atomistic ice adhesion[J]. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(35): 16262-16269. doi: 10.1039/C9NR00104B [37] LEROY F, MÜLLER-PLATHE F. Dry-surface simulation method for the determination of the work of adhesion of solid-liquid interfaces[J]. Langmuir, 2015, 31(30): 8335-8345. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01394 [38] RAMÍREZ R, SINGH J K, MÜLLER-PLATHE F, et al. Ice and water droplets on graphite: A comparison of quantum and classical simulations[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014, 141(20): 204701. [39] XIAO S, ZHANG Z, HE J. Atomistic dewetting mechanics of Wenzel and monostable Cassie-Baxter states[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(38): 24759-24767. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03256D [40] ESPINOSA J R, VEGA C, SANZ E. Ice-water interfacial free energy for the TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P/ice, and mW models as obtained from the mold integration technique[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(15): 8068-8075. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11221 [41] DUTTA R C, KHAN S, SINGH J K. Wetting transition of water on graphite and boron-nitride surfaces: A molecular dynamics study[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2011, 302(1-2): 310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.07.006 [42] DE RUIJTER M J, BLAKE T D, DE CONINCK J. Dynamic wetting studied by molecular modeling simulations of droplet spreading[J]. Langmuir, 1999, 15(22): 7836-7847. doi: 10.1021/la990171l [43] ZHANG K. Dissipative particle dynamics for anti-icing on solid surfaces[J]. Chemical Physics, 2023, 568: 111824. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2023.111824 [44] WANG M, YANG T, CAO G, et al. Simulation-guided construction of solar thermal coating with enhanced light absorption capacity for effective icephobicity[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 408: 127316. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127316 [45] LI Y, HAN X, JIN H, et al. Understanding superhydrophobic behaviors on hydrophilic materials: A thermodynamic approach[J]. Materials Research Express, 2021, 8(7): 076403. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1188 [46] XIANG T, CHEN X, LYU Z, et al. Stable photothermal solid slippery surface with enhanced anti-icing and de-icing properties[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 624: 157178. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157178 [47] 李鑫林. 仿生超疏水表面的构建及其防冰特性研究[D]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2020.LI Xinlin. Fabrication of bionic superhydrophobic surface and its anti-icing performance[D]. Jilin: Jilin University, 2020(in Chinese). [48] SILLS R B, THOULESS M D. The effect of cohesive-law parameters on mixed-mode fracture[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 109: 353-368. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.006 [49] HE Z, XIAO S, GAO H, et al. Multiscale crack initiator promoted super-low ice adhesion surfaces[J]. Soft Matter, 2017, 13(37): 6562-6568. doi: 10.1039/C7SM01511A [50] YU Y, CHEN L, WENG D, et al. Effect of doping SiO2 nanoparticles and phenylmethyl silicone oil on the large-scale deicing property of PDMS coatings[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(42): 48250-48261. [51] NAZIFI S, HUANG Z, HAKIMIAN A, et al. Fracture-controlled surfaces as extremely durable ice-shedding materials[J]. Materials Horizons, 2022, 9(10): 2524-2532. doi: 10.1039/D2MH00619G [52] FENG A, VINCENT A, PERVIER M L A. Measurement and FEM of ice adhesion to the downstream pipe of an air cycle machine[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2022, 196: 103512. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103512 [53] WANG P, ZHAO H, ZHENG B, et al. A super-robust armoured superhydrophobic surface with excellent anti-icing ability[J]. Journal of Bionics Engineering, 2023, 20(5): 1891-1904. [54] ZARASVAND K A, MOHSENI M, GOLOVIN K. Cohesive zone analysis of cylindrical ice adhesion: Determining whether interfacial toughness or strength controls fracture[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2021, 183: 103219. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103219 [55] SCHULZ M, SINAPIUS M. Evaluation of different ice adhesion tests for mechanical deicing systems[C]. SAE 2015 International Conference on Icing of Aircraft, Engines, and Structures. Warrendale: SAE Technical Paper, 2015. [56] WILEN L A, WETTLAUFER J S, ELBAUM M, et al. Dispersion-force effects in interfacial premelting of ice[J]. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter, 1995, 52(16): 12426-12433. [57] RARATY L E, TABOR D. The adhesion and strength properties of ice[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1958, 245(1241): 184-201. [58] JELLINEK H H G. Ice adhesion[J]. Canadian Journal of Physics, 1962, 40(10): 1294-1309. doi: 10.1139/p62-138 [59] SARSHAR M A, SWARCTZ C, HUNTER S, et al. Effects of contact angle hysteresis on ice adhesion and growth on superhydrophobic surfaces under dynamic flow conditions[J]. Colloid and Polymer Science, 2013, 291: 427-435. doi: 10.1007/s00396-012-2753-4 [60] NISHINO T, MEGURO M, NAKAMAE K, et al. The lowest surface free energy based on —CF3 alignment[J]. Langmuir, 1999, 15(13): 4321-4323. doi: 10.1021/la981727s [61] MEULER A J, SMITH J D, VARANASI K K, et al. Relationships between water wettability and ice adhesion[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2010, 2(11): 3100-3110. [62] ONDA T, SHIBUICHI S, SATOH N, et al. Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces[J]. Langmuir, 1996, 12(9): 2125-2127. doi: 10.1021/la950418o [63] KIM P, WONG T S, ALVARENGA J, et al. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance[J]. ACS Nano, 2012, 6(8): 6569-6577. doi: 10.1021/nn302310q [64] PEPPOU-CHAPMAN S, HONG J K, WATERHOUSE A, et al. Life and death of liquid-infused surfaces: A review on the choice, analysis and fate of the infused liquid layer[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(11): 3688-3715. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00036A [65] BEEMER D L, WANG W, KOTA A K. Durable gels with ultra-low adhesion to ice[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(47): 18253-18258. doi: 10.1039/C6TA07262C [66] GOLOVIN K, DHYANI A, THOULESS M D, et al. Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6438): 371-375. doi: 10.1126/science.aav1266 [67] ZHU G, SU J, YIN C, et al. Constructing a robust ZIF-7 based superhydrophobic coating with the excellent performance in self-cleaning, anti-icing, anti-biofouling and anti-corrosion[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 622: 156907. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156907 [68] WANG Z, ZHAO Z, WEN G, et al. Fracture-promoted ultraslippery ice detachment interface for long-lasting anti-icing[J]. ACS Nano, 2023, 17(14): 13724-13733. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03023 [69] DARMANIN T, GUITTARD F. Recent advances in the potential applications of bioinspired superhydrophobic materials[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(39): 16319-16359. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02071E [70] SVINTERIKOS E, ZUBURTIKUDIS I, KHALIFEH H A, et al. Multifunctional polymer-based coatings for outdoor glass surfaces: A state of the art[J]. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 2023, 6(3): 310-332. [71] JEEVAHAN J, CHANDRASEKARAN M, BRITTO JOSEPH G, et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces: A review on fundamentals, applications, and challenges[J]. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 2018, 15: 231-250. doi: 10.1007/s11998-017-0011-x [72] SON S M, KIM M, YOO J J, et al. Fabrication of carbon fiber/polyamide 6 composites with water resistance and anti-icing performance using a superhydrophobic fluorinated-polydopamine coating[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2023, 238: 110048. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110048 [73] ZENG Q, ZHOU H, HUANG J, et al. Review on the recent development of durable superhydrophobic materials for practical applications[J]. Nanoscale, 2021, 13(27): 11734-11764. doi: 10.1039/D1NR01936H [74] PAN R, ZHANG H, ZHONG M. Triple-scale superhydrophobic surface with excellent anti-icing and icephobic performance via ultrafast laser hybrid fabrication[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 13(1): 1743-1753. [75] ZHU T, CHENG Y, HUANG J, et al. A transparent superhydrophobic coating with mechanochemical robustness for anti-icing, photocatalysis and self-cleaning[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 399: 125746. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125746 [76] WANG D, SUN Q, HOKKANEN M J, et al. Design of robust superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Nature, 2020, 582(7810): 55-59. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2331-8 [77] FU K, LU C, LIU Y, et al. Mechanically robust, self-healing superhydrophobic anti-icing coatings based on a novel fluorinated polyurethane synthesized by a two-step thiol click reaction[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 404: 127110. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127110 [78] CHENG Y, WANG Y, ZHANG X, et al. Spontaneous, scalable, and self-similar superhydrophobic coatings for all-weather deicing[J]. Nano Research, 2023, 16(5): 7171-7179. [79] WANG P, YAO T, LI Z, et al. A superhydrophobic/electrothermal synergistically anti-icing strategy based on graphene composite[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2020, 198: 108307. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108307 [80] ZHAO Z, CHEN H, LIU X, et al. Development of high-efficient synthetic electric heating coating for anti-icing/de-icing[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018, 349: 340-346. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.011 [81] WU X, LIAO Y, YAO L, et al. A non-percolative rGO/XLPE composite with high electrothermal performance at high voltage and effective de-/anti-icing for transmission-lines[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2022, 230: 109772. [82] ZHAO Z, CHEN H, ZHU Y, et al. A robust superhydrophobic anti-icing/de-icing composite coating with electrothermal and auxiliary photothermal performances[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2022, 227: 109578. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109578 [83] WANG L, GONG Q, ZHAN S, et al. Robust anti-icing performance of a flexible superhydrophobic surface[J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(35): 7729-7735. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602480 [84] 李君, 矫维成, 王寅春, 等. 超疏水材料在防/除冰技术中的应用研究进展[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(1): 23-38.LI Jun, JIAO Weicheng, WANG Yinchun, et al. Research progress on application of superhydrophobic materials in anti-icing and de-icing technology[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(1): 23-38(in Chinese). [85] 邓朝辉, 金汝诗, 戚栋明, 等. 防覆/除冰功能复合材料的制备和应用研究进展[J]. 复合材料学报, 2023, 40(10): 4930-4942. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20230302.001DENG Chaohui, JIN Rushi, QI Dongming, et al. Preparation of anti-icing/deicing functional composite materials and its research progress[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2023, 40(10): 4930-4942(in Chinese). doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20230302.001 [86] 石婷. 双疏减反射涂层的制备及性能研究[D]. 常州: 常州大学, 2022.SHI Ting. Preparation and properties of amphiphobic antireflective coating[D]. Changzhou: Changzhou University, 2022(in Chinese). [87] LEE S E, KIM H J, LEE S H, et al. Superamphiphobic surface by nanotransfer molding and isotropic etching[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(25): 8070-8075. doi: 10.1021/la4011086 [88] 杜娟, 汪鸿宇, 石玉超, 等. 基于MOF材料的涂层应用与机制研究进展[J]. 复合材料学报, 2024, 41(3): 1095-1110.DU Juan, WANG Hongyu, SHI Yuchao, et al. Research progress on coating application and mechanism based on MOF materials[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41(3): 1095-1110(in Chinese). [89] WANG L, MCCARTHY T J. Covalently attached liquids: Instant omniphobic surfaces with unprecedented repellency[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(1): 244-248. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509385 [90] LESLIE D C, WATERHOUSE A, BERTHET J B, et al. A bioinspired omniphobic surface coating on medical devices prevents thrombosis and biofouling[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32(11): 1134-1140. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3020 [91] SATTARI M, OLAD A, MARYAMI F, et al. Facile fabrication of durable and fluorine-free liquid infused surfaces on aluminum substrates with excellent anti-icing, anticorrosion, and antibiofouling properties[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2023, 38: 102860. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.102860 [92] LIU M, HOU Y, LI J, et al. Transparent slippery liquid-infused nanoparticulate coatings[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 337: 462-470. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.118 [93] LYU J, YAO X, ZHENG Y, et al. Antiadhesion organogel materials: From liquid to solid[J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(45): 1703032. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703032 [94] ZHANG J, LIU B, TIAN Y, et al. Facile one-step method to fabricate a slippery lubricant-infused surface (LIS) with self-replenishment properties for anti-icing applications[J]. Coatings, 2020, 10(2): 119. doi: 10.3390/coatings10020119 [95] HE Z, WU C, HUA M, et al. Bioinspired multifunctional anti-icing hydrogel[J]. Matter, 2020, 2(3): 723-734. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.12.017 [96] CHEN D, GELENTER M D, HONG M, et al. Icephobic surfaces induced by interfacial nonfrozen water[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(4): 4202-4214. [97] YU Y, JIN B, JAMIL M I, et al. Highly stable amphiphilic organogel with exceptional anti-icing performance[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(13): 12838-12845. [98] OZBAY S, YUCEEL C, ERBIL H Y. Improved icephobic properties on surfaces with a hydrophilic lubricating liquid[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(39): 22067-22077. [99] LIU X, CHEN H, ZHAO Z, et al. Slippery liquid-infused porous electric heating coating for anti-icing and de-icing applications[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 374: 889-896. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.077 [100] ZHOU P, WANG Y, ZHANG X. Bi2Se3 nanosheets-based photothermal composites with hydrophobic surface for synergistic anti-/de-icing[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2023, 233: 109916. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109916 [101] TAN S, HAN X, CHENG S, et al. Photothermal solid slippery surfaces with rapid self-healing, improved anti/de-icing and excellent stability[J]. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2023, 44(6): 2200816. doi: 10.1002/marc.202200816 [102] WANG L, TIAN Z, ZHU D, et al. Environmentally adapted slippery-superhydrophobic switchable interfaces for anti-icing[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 626: 157201. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157201 [103] WANG F, DING W, HE J, et al. Phase transition enabled durable anti-icing surfaces and its DIY design[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 360: 243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.224 [104] SHAMSHIRI M, JAFARI R, MOMEN G. A novel hybrid anti-icing surface combining an aqueous self-lubricating coating and phase-change materials[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2023, 177: 107414. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107414 [105] VOGEL N, BELISLE R A, HATTON B, et al. Transparency and damage tolerance of patternable omniphobic lubricated surfaces based on inverse colloidal monolayers[J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(1): 2176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3176 [106] WANG F, XIAO S, ZHUO Y, et al. Liquid layer generators for excellent icephobicity at extremely low temperatures[J]. Materials Horizons, 2019, 6(10): 2063-2072. doi: 10.1039/C9MH00859D [107] GOLOVIN K, KOBAKU S P R, LEE D H, et al. Designing durable icephobic surfaces[J]. Science Advances, 2016, 2(3): e1501496. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501496 [108] GOLOVIN K, TUTEJA A. A predictive framework for the design and fabrication of icephobic polymers[J]. Science Advances, 2017, 3(9): e1701617. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701617 [109] GRIFFITH A A. VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1921, 221(582-593): 163-198. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 [110] KENDALL K. The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1971, 4(8): 1186. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/4/8/320 [111] CROSBY A J, SHULL K R, LAKROUT H, et al. Deformation and failure modes of adhesively bonded elastic layers[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, 88(5): 2956-2966. doi: 10.1063/1.1288017 [112] CHAUDHURY M K, KIM K H. Shear-induced adhesive failure of a rigid slab in contact with a thin confined film[J]. The European Physical Journal E, 2007, 23: 175-183. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2007-10171-x [113] WANG C, FULLER T, ZHANG W, et al. Thickness dependence of ice removal stress for a polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite: Sylgard 184[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(43): 12819-12826. doi: 10.1021/la5030444 [114] LIU Y, MA L, WANG W, et al. An experimental study on soft PDMS materials for aircraft icing mitigation[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 447: 599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.032 [115] ZHUO Y, XIAO S, AMIRFAZLI A, et al. Polysiloxane as icephobic materials—The past, present and the future[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 405: 127088. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127088 [116] ZHUO Y, HÅKONSEN V, HE Z, et al. Enhancing the mechanical durability of icephobic surfaces by introducing autonomous self-healing function[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(14): 11972-11978. [117] SOBHANI S, BAKHSHANDEH E, JAFARI R, et al. Mechanical properties, icephobicity, and durability assessment of HT-PDMS nanocomposites: Effectiveness of sol-gel silica precipitation content[J]. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2023, 105(2): 348-359. doi: 10.1007/s10971-022-06033-2 [118] BLAISZIK B J, KRAMER S L B, OLUGEBEFOLA S C, et al. Self-healing polymers and composites[J]. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2010, 40: 179-211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104532 [119] ROY N, BRUCHMANN B, LEHN J M. Dynamers: Dynamic polymers as self-healing materials[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(11): 3786-3807. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00194C [120] ZHUO Y, HÅKONSEN V, LIU S, et al. Ultra-robust icephobic coatings with high toughness, strong substrate adhesion and self-healing capability[J]. Science China materials, 2023, 66(5): 2071-2078. [121] SONG P, WANG H. High-performance polymeric materials through hydrogen-bond cross-linking[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(18): 1901244. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901244 [122] SIJBESMA R P, BEIJER F H, BRUNSVELD L, et al. Reversible polymers formed from self-complementary monomers using quadruple hydrogen bonding[J]. Science, 1997, 278(5343): 1601-1604. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1601 [123] MORELLE X P, ILLEPERUMA W R, TIAN K, et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels below water freezing temperature[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(35): 1801541. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801541 [124] JAMIL M I, ZHAN X, CHEN F, et al. Durable and scalable candle soot icephobic coating with nucleation and fracture mechanism[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(34): 31532-31542. [125] IRAJIZAD P, AL-BAYATI A, ESLAMI B, et al. Stress-localized durable icephobic surfaces[J]. Materials Horizons, 2019, 6(4): 758-766. doi: 10.1039/C8MH01291A [126] MENINI R, FARZANEH M. Advanced icephobic coatings[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2011, 25(9): 971-992. doi: 10.1163/016942410X533372 [127] WANG P, YANG M, ZHENG B, et al. Soft and rigid integrated durable coating for large-scale deicing[J]. Langmuir, 2022, 39(1): 403-410. [128] MOHSENI M, RECLA L, MORA J, et al. Quasicrystalline coatings exhibit durable low interfacial toughness with ice[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(30): 36517-36526. [129] DHYANI A, PIKE C, BRAID J L, et al. Facilitating large-scale snow shedding from in-field solar arrays using icephobic surfaces with low-interfacial toughness[J]. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2022, 7(5): 2101032. doi: 10.1002/admt.202101032 [130] YU Y, CHEN L, WENG D, et al. Solvent volatilization-induced cross-linking of PDMS coatings for large-scale deicing applications[J]. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2022, 5(1): 57-66. [131] RØNNEBERG S, ZHUO Y, LAFORTE C, et al. Interlaboratory study of ice adhesion using different techniques[J]. Coatings, 2019, 9(10): 678. doi: 10.3390/coatings9100678 [132] DHYANI A, WANG J, HALVEY A K, et al. Design and applications of surfaces that control the accretion of matter[J]. Science, 2021, 373(6552): eaba5010. doi: 10.1126/science.aba5010 [133] KULINICH S A, FARZANEH M. Ice adhesion on super-hydrophobic surfaces[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 255(18): 8153-8157. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.033 [134] ZHU Z, LIANG H, SUN D W. Infusing silicone and camellia seed oils into micro-/nanostructures for developing novel anti-icing/frosting surfaces for food freezing applications[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(11): 14874-14883. [135] LAFORTE C, LAFORTE J L. Deicing strains and stresses of iced substrates[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2012, 26(4-5): 603-620. doi: 10.1163/016942411X574790 [136] RØNNEBERG S, HE J, ZHANG Z. The need for standards in low ice adhesion surface research: A critical review[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2020, 34(3): 319-347. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2019.1679523 [137] GAO L, TAO T, LIU Y, et al. A field study of ice accretion and its effects on the power production of utility-scale wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 167: 917-928. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.014 [138] PENG Y, VEERAKUMAR R, ZHANG Z, et al. An experimental study on mitigating dynamic ice accretion process on bridge cables with a superhydrophobic coating[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2022, 132: 110573. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2021.110573 [139] VEERAKUMAR R, GAO L, LIU Y, et al. Dynamic ice accretion process and its effects on the aerodynamic drag characteristics of a power transmission cable model[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2020, 169: 102908. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102908 [140] 董笑宇. 基于超声微振动的风力机叶片防/除冰仿真与试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2021.DONG Xiaoyu. Simulation and experimental researches on anti-icing and de-icing of wind turbine blade based on ultrasonic micro-vibration[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2021(in Chinese). [141] 陈建兵, 刘伯林, 陈万华, 等. 大型低温风洞模型进出系统关键技术分析[J]. 实验流体力学, 2022, 36(1): 37-43. doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210140CHEN Jianbing, LIU Bolin, CHEN Wanhua, et al. Key technology for model access system in cryogenic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 36(1): 37-43(in Chinese). doi: 10.11729/syltlx20210140 [142] VEERAKUMAR R, TIAN L, HU H, et al. An experimental study of dynamic icing process on an aluminum-conductor-steel-reinforced power cable with twisted outer strands[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2023, 142: 110823. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110823