Experimental study on shear behavior of externally prestressed ultra-high performance concrete beams without stirrups
-
摘要: 为研究超高性能混凝土(Ultra-high performance concrete,UHPC)无腹筋梁的抗剪性能,本次试验共制作9根体外预应力无腹筋UHPC梁,试验参数包括预应力的大小、剪跨比、纵向配筋率和钢纤维掺量,通过四点加载方法分析试验构件的破坏形态、开裂强度和极限强度。试验结果表明:无预应力无腹筋UHPC梁在剪跨比为1.0加载时发生弯曲破坏,设置钢绞线25%极限强度张拉值使无腹筋UHPC梁的正截面抗弯能力得到强化,弯矩增幅为157%,使试验梁从弯曲破坏转变为剪切破坏。张拉25%和40%控制应力的UHPC梁的开裂荷载分别提高了1.2倍和2.6倍,有效抑制了裂缝的形成。体外预应力张拉40%控制应力,剪跨比为1.0和1.5时UHPC梁均发生剪切破坏,但是剪跨比增大至2.0时,UHPC梁发生弯曲破坏,受压区混凝土压溃。规范中的抗剪公式均低估了体外预应力无腹筋UHPC梁的抗剪承载力,其斜截面抗剪强度的实验值与计算值之比的平均值分别为2.28和3.21。Abstract: In order to study the shear behavior of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams without stirrups, 9 externally prestressed UHPC beams without stirrups were fabricated. The experimental parameters included the level of prestress, shear span-to-depth ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio and volume fraction of steel fibers. Four-point loading method was used to obtain the failure patterns, cracking strength and ultimate strength. The results show that the non-prestressed UHPC beam under the shear span-to-depth ratio of 1.0 suffers from flexural failure. However, the flexural resistance of the normal section of UHPC beam is strengthened by a prestressing tension of 25% ultimate strength of the strands, resulting in an increase of the flexural moment by 157% and turning into a shear failure. Compared with non-prestressed UHPC beam, the cracking loads of UHPC beams tensioned by 25% prestress and 40% prestress increase by 1.2 times and 2.6 times, respectively, which effectively inhibit the formation of cracks. The UHPC beams with 40% prestress under shear span-to-depth ratio of 1.0 and 1.5 fail in shear. However, when the shear span-to-depth ratio increases to 2.0, the UHPC beam suffers from a flexural failure, which leads to concrete crushing in the compression zone. The formulae of the codes underestimate the shear capacity of the externally prestressed UHPC beams, since the average ratios of the experimental shear capacity to the calculated one of the inclined section are 2.28 and 3.21, respectively.
-
表 1 无腹筋超高性能混凝土(UHPC)梁设计参数及命名
Table 1. Design parameters and nomenclature of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams without stirrups
Number Specimen Prestress
level/%Longitudinal
reinforcements ratio/%Volume fraction of
steel fibers/%Shear span-to-depth
ratioBeam1 P0-L2-2vol%-R1 0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Beam2 P1-L2-2vol%-R1 25 2.0 2.0 1.0 Beam3 P2-L2-2vol%-R1 40 2.0 2.0 1.0 Beam4 P2-L2-2vol%-R1.5 40 2.0 2.0 1.5 Beam5 P2-L2-2vol%-R2 40 2.0 2.0 2.0 Beam6 P2-L1-2vol%-R1 40 1.0 2.0 1.0 Beam7 P2-L3-2vol%-R1 40 3.0 2.0 1.0 Beam8 P2-L2-1vol%-R1 40 2.0 1.0 1.0 Beam9 P2-L2-1.5vol%-R1 40 2.0 1.5 1.0 表 2 UHPC力学性能
Table 2. Mechanical properties of UHPC
Volume fraction of
steel fiber/vol%1.0 1.5 2.0 ${f_{{\rm{cu}}}}$/MPa 163 179 171 ${f_{{\rm{ts}}}}$/MPa 12 14 16 ${f_{{\rm{ct, fl}}}}$/MPa 27 30 31 ${\sigma _{{\rm{f}}1}}$/MPa 4.31 5.62 8.94 ${\sigma _{{\rm{f2}}}}$/MPa 2.65 3.46 5.50 ${E_{\rm{c}}}$/MPa 39243 39928 40983 Notes: ${f_{{\rm{cu}}}}$—Cubic compressive strength; ${f_{{\rm{ts}}}}$—Splitting tensile strength; ${f_{{\rm{ct, fl}}}}$—Flexural strength; ${\sigma _{{\rm{f}}1}}$—Tested post-cracking strength; ${\sigma _{{\rm{f2}}}}$—Post-cracking strength for design; ${E_{\rm{c}}}$—Elastic modulus. 表 3 预应力张拉封锚后无腹筋UHPC梁应变值
Table 3. Strain value of UHPC beams without stirrups after prestress anchorage
Number Steel strand Longitudinal reinforcement Bottom of UHPC beam Top of UHPC beam Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Beam1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beam2 1546 301 −90 −18 −295 −12 45 2 Beam3 2577 503 −83 −17 −465 −19 129 5 Beam4 2724 531 −110 −22 −520 −21 123 5 Beam5 2476 483 −35 −7 −712 −29 99 4 Beam6 2832 552 −110 −22 −556 −23 130 5 Beam7 2476 483 −55 −11 −429 −18 85 3 Beam8 2557 499 −130 −26 −232 −9 111 4 Beam9 2582 503 −29 −6 −416 −17 126 5 表 4 无腹筋UHPC梁的应力与应变值
Table 4. Stress and strain of UHPC beams without stirrups
Number Steel strand Longitudinal reinforcement Bottom of UHPC beam Top of UHPC beam Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Strain/10−6 Stress/MPa Beam1 0 0 2397 479 3566 146 −1714 −70 Beam2 4832 942 1 915 383 2257 92 −2220 −91 Beam3 6077 1185 504 101 553 23 −2733 −112 Beam4 5820 1135 76 15 1110 45 −2347 −96 Beam5 8236 1606 145 29 755 31 −3452 −141 Beam6 6046 1179 239 48 290 12 −1735 −71 Beam7 4078 795 271 54 1243 51 −1670 −68 Beam8 5535 1079 550 110 1183 48 −2114 −86 Beam9 5717 1115 285 57 604 25 −1 845 −75 表 5 实验结果汇总
Table 5. Summary of test results
Number Specimen name Cracking load/kN Northern load/kN Southern load/kN Failure mode Tested peak load/kN Beam1 P0-L2-2vol%-R1 50 170 180 Flexural failure 175 Beam2 P1-L2-2vol%-R1 110 424 450 Southern shear failure 450 Beam3 P2-L2-2vol%-R1 180 486 513 Northern shear failure 486 Beam4 P2-L2-2vol%-R1.5 150 330 346 Southern shear failure 346 Beam5 P2-L2-2vol%-R2 90 283 305 Flexural failure 294 Beam6 P2-L1-2vol%-R1 160 435 451 Southern shear failure 451 Beam7 P2-L3-2vol%-R1 160 485 494 Northern shear failure 485 Beam8 P2-L2-1vol%-R1 150 427 457 Northern shear failure 427 Beam9 P2-L2-1.5vol%-R1 120 456 459 Southern shear failure 459 表 6 无腹筋UHPC梁斜截面抗剪强度的实验值与计算值
Table 6. Experimental and calculated values of shear strength on the inclined section of UHPC beams without stirrups
Number Vu,test /kN French code NF P 18-710[24] Chinese code GB 50010—2010[29] Vc/kN Vf/kN Vu1/kN Vu,test/Vu1 Vc/kN Vp/kN Vu2/kN Vu,test/Vu2 Beam1 175 37.1 182.9 219.9 0.80 140.0 0.0 140.0 1.25 Beam2 450 41.1 182.9 224.0 2.01 140.0 4.2 144.2 3.12 Beam3 486 43.5 182.9 226.4 2.15 140.0 7.0 147.0 3.31 Beam4 346 43.5 182.9 226.4 1.53 140.0 7.4 147.4 2.35 Beam5 294 43.5 182.9 226.4 1.30 116.7 6.8 123.4 2.38 Beam6 451 43.5 182.9 226.4 1.99 140.0 7.7 147.7 3.05 Beam7 485 43.5 182.9 226.4 2.14 140.0 6.8 146.8 3.30 Beam8 427 42.8 88.2 130.9 3.26 105.0 7.0 112.0 3.81 Beam9 459 44.3 115.0 159.2 2.88 122.5 7.0 129.5 3.54 For all beams Mean of Vu,test/Vu1=2.01; STDEV=0.76 Mean of Vu,test/Vu2=2.90; STDEV=0.79 For shear-failure beams Mean of Vu,test/Vu1=2.28; STDEV=0.59 Mean of Vu,test/Vu2=3.21; STDEV=0.46 Notes: Vu,test—Tested shear strength; Vu1—Calculated shear strength of French code; Vu2—Calculated shear strength of Chinese code; Vc—Calculation of UHPC contribution; Vf—Calculation of fiber contribution; Vp—Calculation of prestress contribution. -
[1] 管品武, 涂雅筝, 张普, 等. 超高性能混凝土单轴拉压本构关系研究[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(5):1295-1305.GUAN Pinwu, TU Yazheng, ZHANG Pu, et al. A review on constitutive relationship of ultra-high performance concrete under uniaxial compression and tension[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2019,36(5):1295-1305(in Chinese). [2] 张文华, 张仔祥, 刘鹏宇, 等. 多尺度纤维增强超高性能混凝土的轴心抗拉和抗压行为[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2020, 48(8):1155-1167.ZHANG Wenhua, ZHANG Zixiang, LIU Pengyu, et al. Uniaxial tensile and compressive stress-strain behavior of multi-scale fiber-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2020,48(8):1155-1167(in Chinese). [3] 邵旭东, 管亚萍, 晏班夫. 预制超高性能混凝土π形梁桥的设计与初步试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(1):46-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.01.006SHAO Xudong, GUAN Yaping, YAN Banfu. Design and preliminary experiments of UHPC π-shaped girder bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31(1):46-56(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.01.006 [4] 张哲, 邵旭东, 李文光, 等. 超高性能混凝土轴拉性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(8):50-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.08.007ZHANG Zhe, SHAO Xudong, LI Wenguang, et al. Axial tensile behavior test of ultra high performance concrete[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2015,28(8):50-58(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2015.08.007 [5] 杲晓龙, 王俊颜, 郭君渊, 等. 循环荷载作用下超高性能混凝土的轴拉力学性能及本构关系模型[J]. 复合材料学报, 2021, 38(11): 3925-3938.GAO Xiaolong, WANG Junyan, GUO Junyuan, et al. Axial tensile mechanical properties and constitutive relation model of ultra-high performance concrete under cyclic loading [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(11): 3925-3938(in Chinese). [6] 张晓亮, 屈文俊. 无腹筋GFRP筋混凝土梁抗剪性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2010, 23(5):51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2010.05.008ZHANG Xiaoliang, QU Wenjun. Shear behavior test of GFRP-reinforced concrete beams without stirrups[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2010,23(5):51-57(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2010.05.008 [7] ARSLAN Guray. Cracking shear strength of RC slender beams without stirrups[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2008,14(3):177-182. doi: 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.14 [8] LANTSOGHT E O. Database of shear experiments on steel fiber reinforced concrete beams without stirrups[J]. Materials,2019,12(6):917. doi: 10.3390/ma12060917 [9] 方志, 向宇, 刘传乐. 配置碳纤维预应力筋的钢纤维活性粉末混凝土无腹筋梁疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(1):101-107.FANG Zhi, XIANG Yu, LIU Chuanle. Experimental study on fatigue properties of CFRP prestressed RPC beams without stirrups[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2013,34(1):101-107(in Chinese). [10] 郑辉, 方志, 刘明. 预应力活性粉末混凝土箱梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(6):51-63.ZHENG Hui, FANG Zhi, LIU Ming. Experimental study on shear behavior of prestressed reactive powder concrete box girders[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2015,48(6):51-63(in Chinese). [11] 徐海宾, 邓宗才, 陈春生, 等. 超高性能纤维混凝土梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(12):91-97.XU Haibin, DENG Zongcai, CHEN Chunsheng, et al. Experimental study on shear strength of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2014,47(12):91-97(in Chinese). [12] VOO Y L, FOSTER S J, GILBERT R I. Shear strength of fiber reinforced reactive powder concrete prestressed girders without stirrups[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology,2006,4(1):123-132. doi: 10.3151/jact.4.123 [13] VOO Y L, POON W K, FOSTER S J. Shear strength of steel fiber-reinforced ultrahigh-performance concrete beams without stirrups[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,136(11):1393-1400. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000234 [14] WU Xiangguo, HAN Sangmook. First diagonal cracking and ultimate shear of I-shaped reinforced girders of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete without stirrup[J]. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials,2009,3 (1):47-56. doi: 10.4334/IJCSM.2009.3.1.047 [15] 梁兴文, 胡翱翔, 于婧, 等. 钢纤维对超高性能混凝土抗弯力学性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(3):722-731.LIANG Xingwen, HU Aoxiang, YU Jing, et al. Effect of steel fibers on the flexural response of ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2018,35(3):722-731(in Chinese). [16] 杨简, 陈宝春, 吴香国, 等. 新拌超高性能纤维增强混凝土流动性能对其抗压强度的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2021, 38(11): 3827-3837.YANG Jian, CHEN Baochun, WU Xiangguo, et al. Influence of the fresh ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete flowability on its compressive strength [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(11): 3827-3837(in Chinese). [17] 姜海波, 李宇鸿, 肖杰, 等. 预制节段干接缝体外预应力混凝土简支梁抗剪性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(12):188-195. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.12.018JIANG Haibo, LI Yuhong, XIAO Jie, et al. Shear behavior of precast concrete segmental simply supported beam with external tendons and dry joints[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31(12):188-195(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.12.018 [18] 徐海宾, 邓宗才. 预应力超高性能钢纤维混凝土梁受弯性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35 (12):58-64.XU Haibin, DENG Zongcai. Experimental research on flexural behavior of prestressed ultra-high performance steel fiber concrete beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2014,35 (12):58-64(in Chinese). [19] WANG Jingquan, QI Jianan, ZHANG Jian. Optimization method and experimental study on the shear strength of externally prestressed concrete beams[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2014, 17(4): 607-615. [20] QI Jianan, WANG Jingquan, MA Zhongguo, et al. Shear behavior of externally prestressed concrete beams with draped tendons[J]. ACI Structural Journal,2016,113(4):677-688. [21] 方志, 刘明, 郑辉. 预应力活性粉末混凝土箱梁抗弯性能试验[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2015, 32(6):8-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2015.06.002FANG Zhi, LIU Ming, ZHENG Hui. Experiment on flexural behaviors of prestressed reactive powder concrete box girder[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2015,32(6):8-16(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2015.06.002 [22] 谭皓月, 张川, 朱爱萍, 等. 低受拉纵筋率时高强轻骨料混凝土无腹筋梁受力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2019, 49(10):64-69.TAN Haoyue, ZHANG Chuan, ZHU Aiping, et al. Experiments on behavior of high-strength lightweight concrete beams without web reinforcement with low longitudinal reinforcement ratio[J]. Building Structure,2019,49(10):64-69(in Chinese). [23] 戚家南, 王景全, 周凯, 等. UHPC梁受剪性能试验与抗剪承载力计算方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33 (7):95-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2020.07.010QI Jianan, WANG Jingquan, ZHOU Kai, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigations on shear strength of UHPC beams[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2020,33 (7):95-103(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2020.07.010 [24] AFNOR. National addition to eurocode 2-Design of concrete structures: specific rules for ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC): NF P 18-710[S]. Paris: FANOR, 2016. [25] 王景全, 戚家南. 有腹筋与无腹筋钢筋混凝土梁抗剪承载力统一计算方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(7):47-57.WANG Jingquan, QI Jia’nan. Unified shear strength computation model for reinforced concrete beams with and without stirrups[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2013,46(7):47-57(in Chinese). [26] 贺志启, 刘钊, 张宇峰. 基于桁-拱叠加模型的体外预应力混凝土梁抗剪承载力计算方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(1):56-63.HE Zhiqi, LIU Zhao, ZHANG Yufeng. A method based on truss-arch model for calculating the shear strength of externally prestressed concrete beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2010,43(1):56-63(in Chinese). [27] 李国平, 沈殷. 体外预应力混凝土简支梁抗剪承载力计算方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007(2):64-69. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2007.02.011LI Guoping, SHEN Yin. Calculation method for the shear bearing capacity of simply-supported externally prestressed concrete beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2007(2):64-69(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2007.02.011 [28] FANOR. Concrete-ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete-Specifications, performance, production and conformity: NF P 18-470[S]. Paris: FANOR, 2016. [29] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People’s Republic of China. Code for design of concrete structures: GB 50010—2010[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2010(in Chinese).