Buckling behavior of steel rebars in PET FRP-confined rectangular RC columns
-
摘要: 大应变纤维增强聚合物复合材料(LRS FRP)具有大断裂应变(大于5%)的特性,可能带来较高的结构延性,为钢筋混凝土(RC)柱的抗震加固提供了一种新的选择。外包FRP通过混凝土保护层为纵筋提供侧向支撑,防止或减缓纵筋的屈曲。但当箍筋间距较大时纵筋仍可能发生屈曲,尤其是在FRP不均匀约束的矩形柱中,纵筋的提前屈曲降低了柱子的承载能力。为研究不均匀约束情况下,FRP加固柱中钢筋的屈曲行为,本文共设计了28个聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(Polyethylene terephthalate,PET) FRP约束矩形试件,包括16个RC柱和12个素混凝土(PC)柱,对其进行单调轴压试验,研究FRP层数、箍筋间距和截面形状比对约束柱承载力和延性的影响;从试验结果中得到纵筋的平均应力-应变曲线,对FRP约束RC柱中纵筋的应力-应变关系进行定量分析。结果表明,PET FRP约束RC柱可提高其强度和延性,在一定范围内,当约束刚度越大、截面形状比越接近1时,约束效果越好;外包FRP的侧向支撑作用可将纵筋的屈曲推迟到较高的变形水平。
-
关键词:
- 聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯 纤维增强聚合物 /
- 纵筋屈曲 /
- 单调轴压 /
- 纤维增强聚合物约束柱 /
- 侧向支撑
Abstract: Large-rupture-strain fiber reinforced polymers (LRS FRPs) have the large tensile rupture strain value of more than 5%. This characteristic might enhance the load-bearing capacity and ductility and provide a new choice for seismic strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) columns. The FRPs provide lateral support for the longitudinal bars through the cover concrete, which might prevent or delay the buckling of longitudinal steel bars. However, the buckling of the longitudinal reinforcement might still be observed when the stirrup spacing is relatively large. Especially, for the FRP-confined rectangular columns, the ununiform confinement provided by the external FRP for the specimen might result in the buckling of longitudinal bars and reduce the load-bearing capacity of the specimen. In order to study the buckling behavior of longitudinal bars in rectangular RC columns confined by FRP, a total of 28 polyethylene terephthalate (PET) FRP-confined rectangular columns, comprising 16 RC columns and 12 plain concrete (PC) columns, were prepared and tested under monotonic axial compression. The effects of the thickness of external FRP jackets, stirrup spacing and section aspect ratio on the load-bearing capacity of FRP-confined RC columns were studied. To carry out a quantitative study on the buckling behavior of longitudinal steel bars in FRP-confined RC columns, the average axial stress-strain curve of a single longitudinal bar was obtained from the test results. The experimental results show that the application of PET FRP jackets can effectively improve the load-bearing capacity and ductility of RC columns. A large confinement stiffness and a low section aspect ratio close to 1 lead to a high confinement level for RC columns. And the lateral support of FRP can delay the buckling of the steel bars to a higher deformation level. -
表 1 PET FRP约束矩形混凝土柱试件参数及试验结果
Table 1. Key information of PET FRP-confined rectangular concrete column specimens and test results
Specimen name Cross section/mm Type of FRP Number of plies FRP Nominal thickness of FRP/mm Peak axial load Pcc/kN Load after
softening
Pdt/kNUltimate axial load Pcu/kN Ultimate axial deformation Δcu/mm 1PET-200RC(R170)-a 170×130 PET 1 0.841 959.9 874.8 856.5 7.33 1PET-200RC(R170)-b 170×130 PET 1 0.841 1029.1 933.2 920.6 7.83 1PET-PC(R170)-a 170×130 PET 1 0.841 907.7 713.9 735.4 4.97 1PET-PC(R170)-b 170×130 PET 1 0.841 976.2 715.4 710.0 6.74 1PET-200RC(R180)-a 180×120 PET 1 0.841 1001.1 846.5 853.2 6.29 1PET-200RC(R180)-b 180×120 PET 1 0.841 1022.0 887.5 900.6 7.56 1PET-PC(R180)-a 180×120 PET 1 0.841 942.6 713.8 709.0 7.10 1PET-PC(R180)-b 180×120 PET 1 0.841 879.3 674.8 697.6 9.29 1PET-200RC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 1 0.841 1026.1 951.0 929.9 5.75 1PET-200RC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 1 0.841 1007.2 958.9 962.9 5.18 1PET-PC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 1 0.841 954.2 804.7 793.9 5.92 1PET-PC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 1 0.841 948.4 807.4 772.0 6.80 1PET-240RC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 1 0.841 − − − − 1PET-240RC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 1 0.841 1035.2 998.6 998.2 5.08 1PET-PC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 1 0.841 956.5 808.1 799.9 5.94 1PET-PC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 1 0.841 948.4 785.1 772.0 6.80 2PET-200RC(R170)-a 170×130 PET 2 1.682 − − − − 2PET-200RC(R170)-b 170×130 PET 2 1.682 1179.7 1142.0 1309.9 9.69 2PET-PC(R170)-a 170×130 PET 2 1.682 1083.1 982.8 1256.1 9.16 2PET-PC(R170)-b 170×130 PET 2 1.682 1059.9 921.9 1042.4 7.20 2PET-200RC(R180)-a 180×120 PET 2 1.682 1135.2 1096.2 1204.7 9.35 2PET-200RC(R180)-b 180×120 PET 2 1.682 1197.5 1129.1 1230.9 11.31 2PET-PC(R180)-a 180×120 PET 2 1.682 1004.4 878.1 1050.1 9.50 2PET-PC(R180)-b 180×120 PET 2 1.682 1045.8 854.0 1047.5 9.76 2PET-200RC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1246.2 − 1387.1 8.63 2PET-200RC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1277.9 1272.5 1466.9 9.74 2PET-PC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1123.1 1080.6 1200.7 6.80 2PET-PC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1110.2 1063.9 1421.9 9.40 2PET-240RC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 2 1.682 − − − − 2PET-240RC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1222.8 − 1428.1 9.71 2PET-PC(S150)-a 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1126.8 1080.9 1200.7 6.80 2PET-PC(S150)-b 150×150 PET 2 1.682 1110.7 1061.3 1413.1 9.40 Notes: PET—Polyethylene terephthalate; RC—Reinforced concrete; PC—Plain concrete; Specimen name VW-X(Y)-Z: V—Number of plies; W—Type of FRP; X—Type of columns and stirrup spacing for RC columns; Y—Section type and width; S—Square column; R—Rectangular column; Z—a and b represent two identical components. 表 2 钢筋力学性能参数
Table 2. Mechanical parameters of steel
Bar type fy/MPa fu/MPa Es/GPa εu/% Φ12 428 579 202 24.6 Φ8 453 649 201 20.6 Notes: fy and fu—Yield stress and tensile strength of the bars, respectively; Es—Elasticity modulus of the bars; εu—Ultimate strain. 表 3 PET FRP约束矩形混凝土柱试件中钢筋应力-应变曲线上重要点的值
Table 3. Values of important points on the stress-strain curves of longitudinal rebars in PET FRP-confined rectangular concrete column specimens
Specimen name fcc/MPa εcc/% εfy/% fcm/MPa εcm/% fcu/MPa εcu/% 1PET-200RC(R170)-a 88.7 0.74 − 395.6 2.37 332.5 2.92 1PET-200RC(R170)-b 114.4 0.30 1.37 508.1 2.29 449.5 2.92 1PET-200RC(R180)-a 190.8 0.95 − 423.2 3.18 403.8 3.70 1PET-200RC(R180)-b 99.2 0.08 2.26 406.7 1.10 484.3 3.70 1PET-200RC(S150)-a 71.3 0.23 1.94 428.0 1.94 411.6 3.05 1PET-200RC(S150)-b 63.0 0.21 2.02 439.4 2.70 432.5 3.05 1PET-240RC(S150)-b 117.1 0.34 1.19 526.4 2.50 496.1 3.01 1PET-200RC(R170)-b 47.3 0.18 1.50 503.4 2.86 460.7 4.23 1PET-200RC(R180)-a 54.3 0.02 1.10 552.4 2.10 427.2 5.50 1PET-200RC(R180)-b 176.0 0.09 0.63 636.1 3.27 459.4 5.05 1PET-200RC(S150)-a 88.7 0.21 1.54 551.0 2.82 450.5 4.00 1PET-200RC(S150)-b 263.1 0.13 1.19 528.9 3.16 480.0 4.00 1PET-240RC(S150)-b 90.4 0.58 − 426.0 2.57 353.0 4.00 Notes:fcc and εcc—Stress and strain at the beginning point; εfy—Strain when the stress reaches yield strength; fcm and εcm—Peak stress and strain, respectively; fcu and εcu—Yield stress and ultimate strain, respectively. -
[1] LAM L, TENG J G. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2003,17(6-7):471-489. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X [2] WU Y F, WEI Y Y. Effect of cross-sectional aspect ratio on the strength of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete columns[J]. Engineering Structures,2009,32(1):32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.012 [3] HANY N F, HANTOUCHE E G, HARAJLI M H. Axial stress-strain model of CFRP-confined concrete under monotonic and cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2015,19(6):04015004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000557 [4] BOURNAS D A, TRIANTAFILLOU T C. Bar buckling in RC columns confined with composite materials[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2011,15(3):393-403. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000180 [5] SHAHZAD S, AMORN P, IRSHAD Q M, et al. Axial behavior of PET FRP-confined reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2021,25(1):1-17. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001092 [6] DAI J G, BAI Y L, TENG J G. Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2011,15(6):963-973. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000230 [7] DAI J G, LAM L, UEDA T. Seismic retrofit of square RC columns with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibre reinforced polymer composites[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2011,27(1):206-217. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.058 [8] BAI Y L, DAI J G, TENG J G. Cyclic compressive behavior of concrete confined with large rupture strain FRP composites[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2014,18(1):04013025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000386 [9] ISPIR M. Monotonic and cyclic compression tests on concrete confined with PET-FRP[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2014,19(1):04014034. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000490 [10] YE Y Y, LIANG S D, FENG P, et al. Recyclable LRS FRP composites for engineering structures: Current status and future opportunities[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering,2021,212:108689. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108689 [11] 国家基本建筑委员会. 钢筋混凝土结构设计规范: TJ 10—74[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1974.State Infrastructure Commission. Code for design of reinforced concrete structures: TJ 10—74[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 1974(in Chinese). [12] 国家基本建筑委员会. 混凝土结构设计规范: GBJ 10—89[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1989.State Infrastructure Commission. Design code for concrete structures: GBJ 10—89[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 1989(in Chinese). [13] 交通部公路规划设计院. 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范: JTJ 023—85[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1985.Highway Planning and Design Institute of the Ministry of Communications. Code for design of reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts for highways: JTJ 023—85[S]. Beijing: People's Communications Press, 1985(in Chinese). [14] BAI Y L, DAI J G, TENG J G. Buckling of steel reinforcing bars in FRP-confined RC columns: An experimental study[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2017,140:403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.149 [15] BAI Y L, DAI J G, TENG J G. Monotonic stress-strain beha-vior of steel rebars embedded in FRP-confined concrete including buckling[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2017,21(5):04017043.1-04017043.11. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000823 [16] SATO Y, KO H. Modeling of reinforcement buckling in RC columns confined with FRP[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology,2008,6(1):195-204. doi: 10.3151/jact.6.195 [17] GIAMUNDO V, LIGNOLA G P, PROTA A, et al. Analytical evaluation of FRP wrapping effectiveness in restraining reinforcement bar buckling[J]. Journal of Structural En-gineering,2014,140(7):4014043. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000985 [18] BAI Y L, DAI J G, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Cyclic stress-strain model incorporating buckling effect for steel reinforcing bars embedded in FRP-confined concrete[J]. Composite Structures,2017,182:54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.007 [19] 白玉磊, 韩强, 贾俊峰, 等. FRP约束钢筋混凝土柱中钢筋屈曲行为研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2018, 38(1):14-21. doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.01.003BAI Yulei, HAN Qiang, JIA Junfeng, et al. Buckling beha-vior of steel rebars embedded in FRP-confined concrete[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction,2018,38(1):14-21(in Chinese). doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.01.003 [20] SALEEM S, HUSSAIN Q, PIMANMAS A. Compressive behavior of PET FRP-confined circular, square, and rectangular concrete columns[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2017,21(3):04016097. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000754 [21] ISLEEM H F, WANG Z Y, WANG D Y, et al. Monotonic and cyclic axial compressive behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular RC columns[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2018,22(4):4018023. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000860 [22] SILVA M A G. Behavior of square and circular columns strengthened with aramidic or carbon fibers[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2011,25(8):3222-3228. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.007 [23] HAN Q, YUAN W Y, BAI Y L, et al. Compressive behavior of large rupture strain (LRS) FRP-confined square concrete columns: Experimental study and model evaluation[J]. Materials and Structures,2020,53(4):1149-1186. doi: 10.1617/s11527-020-01534-4 [24] MAI A D, SHEIKH M N, YAMAKADO K, et al. Nonuniform CFRP wrapping to prevent sudden failure of FRP confined square RC columns[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2020,24(6):4020063. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001077 [25] ISLEEM H F, WANG D Y, WANG Z Y. A new numerical model for polymer-confined rectangular concrete columns[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil En-gineers-Structures and Buildings,2019,172(7):528-544. doi: 10.1680/jstbu.17.00103 [26] ISLEEM H F, TAHIR M, WANG Z Y. Axial stress-strain model developed for rectangular RC columns confined with FRP wraps and anchors[J]. Structures,2020,23:779-788. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.12.020 [27] ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials: ASTM D3039/D3039M-08[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM Internation, 2008.