Experimental study and finite element analysis of seawater sea-sand engineered cementitious composites beams
-
摘要: 为研究海水海砂高延性纤维增强水泥基复合材料(SSE)梁的抗剪性能,进行了SSE材料的研制,并对玄武岩纤维增强树脂复合材料(Basalt fiber reinforced polymer,BFRP)筋增强海水海砂高延性纤维增强水泥基复合材料(ECC)梁(BFRP/SSE梁)进行剪切试验,分析了配箍率和剪跨比对梁抗剪性能的影响。试验结果表明:SSE的单轴受拉应变最大可达8.3%,平均裂缝宽度约为0.2 mm。BFRP/SSE梁剪切破坏时没有发生剥落破坏。在正常使用极限状态下,BFRP/SSE梁裂缝宽度小于0.3 mm,满足相关规范要求。在少箍筋和无箍筋的情况下,采用SSE制备的梁抗剪承载力反而提高59.32%~99.25%和6.37%~73.68%不等,且刚度也有一定程度的提升。在BFRP/SSE梁的结构设计中可以考虑不设置最小配箍率。采用有限元软件进行数值模拟,探讨了SSE的力学性能对无腹筋BFRP/SSE梁抗剪承载力的影响规律。计算结果表明,随SSE抗压强度提高抗剪承载力增加明显;随SSE抗拉强度提高抗剪承载力缓慢增加;SSE拉伸应变能力对梁抗剪承载力基本没有影响。本研究可为海水海砂ECC梁的工程应用提供参考依据。
-
关键词:
- 海水海砂高延性纤维增强水泥基复合材料 /
- BFRP筋 /
- 剪切性能 /
- 有限元 /
- 应变硬化
Abstract: To study the shear performance of seawater sea-sand engineered cementitious composites (SSE) beams, SSE material was developed. The shear tests of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars reinforced SSE (BFRP/SSE) beams were carried out, and the effects of shear span ratio and stirrup ratio on the shear performance of BFRP/SSE beams were analyzed. The experimental results show that the maximum tensile strain capacity of SSE is 8.3%, and average crack width is about 0.2 mm. When BFRP/SSE beams fail in shear, no spalling failure occurs. The crack width of BFRP/SSE beams at serviceability limit state is less than 0.3 mm, which meets the requirements of relevant code. In the case of few stirrups and no stirrups, the shear capacity of beams prepared by SSE is increased by 59.32%-99.25% and 6.37%-73.68%, and stiffness also increases. Minimum stirrup ratio may not be required in the structural design of BFRP/SSE beams. Through finite element software, the influence of mechanical properties of SSE on the shear capacity of BFRP/SSE beams without web reinforcement was analyzed. The results of finite element analysis show that with increasing the compressive strength of SSE, the shear capacity increases obviously. With the increase of tensile strength of SSE, the shear capacity increases slowly. The tensile strain capacity of SSE has little effect on the shear capacity. This study can be used as a valuable reference for the applications of SSE beams in civil engineering. -
表 1 海水海砂高延性纤维增强水泥基复合材料(SSE)配合比
Table 1. Mixing proportions of seawater sea-sand engineered cementitious composites (SSE)
Mixture ID Binder material Sea-sand/wt% Seawater/wt% PS/wt% PE fiber/vol% Cement/wt% LP/wt% SF/wt% GGBFS/wt% SSE-0.18 1.00 0.14 0.21 1.07 1.04 0.44 0.015 1.5 SSE-0.21 1.00 0.14 0.21 1.07 1.04 0.51 0.015 1.5 SSE-0.27 1.00 0.14 0.21 1.07 1.04 0.65 0.015 1.5 SSM-0.21 1.00 0.14 0.21 1.07 1.04 0.51 0.015 — Notes: SSE-x—SSE with water/binder ratio of x; SSM-0.21—Seawater sea-sand mortar with water/binder ratio of 0.21; LP—Limestone powder; SF—Silica fume; GGBFS—Ground granulated blast furnace slag; PS—Polycarboxylate superplasticizer; PE—Polyethylene. 表 2 玄武岩纤维增强树脂复合材料(BFRP)/SSE梁和BFRP筋增强水泥砂浆(BFRP/SSM)梁试件的主要参数
Table 2. Main parameters of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP)/SSE beam and BFRP reinforced seawater sea-sand mortar (BFRP/SSM) beam specimens
Specimen ID Span/
mmShear span/
mmShear span
ratioHeight/
mmWidth/
mmCover
thickness/mmConcrete Stirrup
ratio/%Longitudinal tensile
reinforcement ratio/%BFRP/SSM-67-1.9 900 300 1.9 200 150 23 SSM-0.21 0.67 3.17 BFRP/SSE-00-1.9 900 300 1.9 200 150 31 SSE-0.21 — 3.17 BFRP/SSE-37-1.9 900 300 1.9 200 150 25 SSE-0.21 0.37 3.17 BFRP/SSM-67-1.3 900 200 1.3 200 150 23 SSM-0.21 0.67 3.17 BFRP/SSE-00-1.3 900 200 1.3 200 150 31 SSE-0.21 — 3.17 BFRP/SSE-37-1.3 900 200 1.3 200 150 25 SSE-0.21 0.37 3.17 Notes: BFRP/SSE-y—x—SSE with shear span ratio of x and stirrup ratio of y; BFRP/SSM-y—x—Seawater sea-sand mortar with shear span ratio of x and stirrup ratio of y. 表 3 FRP筋力学性能指标
Table 3. Mechanical properties of FRP bars
Type of FRP bar Diameter/mm Elastic modulus/GPa Tensile strength/MPa Tensile strain capacity/% BFRP bar 6 53 1190 2.22 8 57 1127 2.14 18 57 1319 2.32 表 4 BFRP/SSE梁和BFRP/SSM梁的特征荷载
Table 4. Characteristic loads of the tested BFRP/SSE and BFRP/SSM beams
Specimen ID Cracking load/kN Shear capacity/kN Shear capacity/Cracking load Service load/kN BFRP/SSM-67-1.9 11.5 106.37 9.25 141.82 BFRP/SSE-00-1.9 11.0 113.15 10.29 150.87 BFRP/SSE-37-1.9 12.5 169.47 13.56 225.96 BFRP/SSM-67-1.3 9.0 123.54 13.73 164.71 BFRP/SSE-00-1.3 16.5 214.56 13.00 286.08 BFRP/SSE-37-1.3 16.0 246.15 15.38 328.20 Notes: Shear capacity is equal to half of peak load. Service load is equal to the peak load divided by 1.5. 表 5 BFRP/SSE梁模拟结果与试验结果的比较
Table 5. Comparison between simulation results and experimental results of BFRP/SSE beams
Specimen ID Shear capacity/kN Mid-span deflection at shear capacity/mm Experimental
resultSimulation
resultDeviation/
%Experimental
resultSimulation
resultDeviation/
%BFRP/SSE-00-1.9 113.15 104.31 −7.81 9.70 9.61 −0.93 BFRP/SSE-37-1.9 169.47 166.93 −1.50 10.81 11.17 3.33 BFRP/SSE-00-1.3 214.56 214.13 −0.20 8.75 9.40 7.43 BFRP/SSE-37-1.3 246.15 241.70 −1.81 — 10.86 — -
[1] 李田雨, 刘小艳, 张玉梅, 等. 海水海砂制备活性粉末混凝土的碳化机理[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(8):8042-8050. doi: 10.11896/cldb.19010123LI Tianyu, LIU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Yumei, et al. Carbonization mechanism of reactive powder concrete with sea-water and sea sand[J]. Materials Reports,2020,34(8):8042-8050(in Chinese). doi: 10.11896/cldb.19010123 [2] XIAO J Z, QIANG C B, NANNI A, et al. Use of sea-sand and seawater in concrete construction: Current status and future opportunities[J]. Construction and Building Mater-ials,2017,155:1101-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.130 [3] JIANG J F, LUO J, YU J T, et al. Performance improvement of a fiber-reinforced polymer bar for a reinforced sea sand and seawater concrete beam in the serviceability limit state[J]. Sensors,2019,19(3):654. doi: 10.3390/s19030654 [4] 王磊, 李威, 陈爽, 等. 海水浸泡对FRP筋-珊瑚混凝土粘结性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(12):3458-3465.WANG Lei, LI Wei, CHEN Shuang, et al. Effects of sea water soaking on the bonding properties of FRP bars-coral concrete[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2018,35(12):3458-3465(in Chinese). [5] 华云涛, 尹世平, 王璐晨. 玄武岩纤维筋海水海砂混凝土梁承载性能及使用性能影响因素研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(2):166-177.HUA Yuntao, YIN Shiping, WANG Luchen. Study on influence factors of bearing capacity and serviceability of BFRP reinforced seawater and sea-sand concrete beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2021,42(2):166-177(in Chinese). [6] LI V C, WANG S X, WU C. Tensile strain-hardening behavior of PVA-ECC[J]. ACI Materials Journal,2001,98(6):483-492. [7] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 纤维增强复合材料工程应用技术规范: GB 50608—2020[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2020.Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Technical code for infrastructure application of FRP composites: GB 50608—2020[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2020(in Chinese). [8] LI V C, WANG S X. Flexural behaviors of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforced engineered cementitious composite beams[J]. ACI Materials Journal,2002,99(1):11-21. [9] YUAN F, PAN J L, LEUNG C K Y. Flexural behaviors of ECC and concrete/ECC composite beams reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2013,17(5):591-602. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000381 [10] 周甲佳, 姚少科, 景川, 等. FRP筋-ECC梁受弯性能[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2020, 37(6):46-53.ZHOU Jiajia, YAO Shaoke, JING Chuan, et al. Flexural behavior of FRP-reinforced ECC beams[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(6):46-53(in Chinese). [11] 葛文杰, 冯肖, 季翔, 等. 纤维增强复材筋增强工程用水泥基复合材料-混凝土复合梁受弯性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(11):23-27.GE Wenjie, FENG Xiao, JI Xiang, et al. Experimental research on the flexural behavior of ECC-concrete compo-site beam reinforced with FRP bars[J]. Industrial Construction,2017,47(11):23-27(in Chinese). [12] YU J T, LIU K K, XU Q F, et al. Feasibility of using seawater to produce ultra-high ductile cementitious composite for construction without steel reinforcement[J]. Structural Concrete,2019,20(2):774-785. doi: 10.1002/suco.201800116 [13] HUANG B T, YU J, WU J Q, et al. Seawater sea-sand engi-neered cementitious composites (SS-ECC) for marine and coastal applications[J]. Composites Communications,2020,20:100353. doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.04.019 [14] 时金娜, 赵燕茹, 郝松, 等. 基于DIC技术的高温后混凝土变形性能[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2019, 22(4):584-591. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2019.04.012SHI Jinna, ZHAO Yanru, HAO Song, et al. Deformation behavior of concrete under uniaxial compression after high temperature by DIC technology[J]. Journal of Building Materials,2019,22(4):584-591(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2019.04.012 [15] Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Recommendations for design and construction of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites with multiple fine cracks[S]. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2008. [16] 王义超, 余江滔, 魏琳卓, 等. 超高韧性氯氧镁水泥基复合材料的耐水性能[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(16):2665-2670. doi: 10.11896/cldb.18070111WANG Yichao, YU Jiangtao, WEI Linzhuo, et al. Water-resistance property of ultra-high toughness magnesium oxychloride cement-based composite[J]. Materials Reports,2019,33(16):2665-2670(in Chinese). doi: 10.11896/cldb.18070111 [17] ZHOU J J, PAN J L, LEUNG C K Y. Mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced engineered cementitious composites in uniaxial compression[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2015,27(1):04014111. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001034 [18] 张锐, 孟庆利, 何畏, 等. 考虑箍筋效应的PP-ECC梁抗剪试验研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(12):234-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.12.025ZHANG Rui, MENG Qingli, HE Wei, et al. Experimental investigation on shear behavior of PP-ECC beams by consi-dering effect of stirrup[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(12):234-241(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.12.025 [19] TOMLINSON D, FAM A. Performance of concrete beams reinforced with basalt FRP for flexure and shear[J]. Jour-nal of Composites for Construction,2015,19:04014036. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000491 [20] OZCEBE G, ERSOY U, TANKUT T. Evaluation of minimum shear reinforcement requirements for higher strength concrete[J]. ACI Structural Journal,1999,96(3):361-368. [21] HAN T S, FEENSTRA P H, BILLINGTON S L. Simulation of highly ductile fiber-reinforced cement based composite components under cyclic loading[J]. ACI Structural Jour-nal,2003,100(6):749-757. [22] 余江滔, 崔璨, 叶俊宏, 等. 基于ABAQUS模拟仿生贝壳珍珠母梁的弯曲性能[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2021, 24(6):1187-1192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2020.01.004YU Jiangtao, CUI Can, YE Junhong, et al. Flexural perfor-mance of bio-inspired stacked beams: A numerical study based on ABAQUS[J]. Journal of Building Materials,2021,24(6):1187-1192(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2020.01.004 [23] CARREIRA D J, CHU K H. Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression[J]. Journal of the American Concrete Institute,1985,82(6):797-804. [24] LI L Z, CAI Z W, YU K Q, et al. Performance-based design of all-grade strain hardening cementitious composites with compressive strengths from 40 MPa to 120 MPa[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites,2019,97:202-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.01.001