Fracture parameters of bamboo scrimber’s transverse quasi-brittle fracture
-
摘要: 重组竹是一种可再生的绿色建筑结构复合材料,具有结构致密均匀、力学性能高强稳定、尺寸因需而定、原材料利用率高等特点,在工程应用方面前景广阔。为研究重组竹横向准脆性断裂的断裂参数,对不同尺寸重组竹单边缺口(SEN)试样进行三点弯曲断裂试验,基于边界效应模型(BEM),引入平均粒径G这一重要的细观结构参量,建立重组竹细观结构与宏观力学性能之间的关系,由试验得到的峰值荷载Pmax计算重组竹横向准脆性断裂的断裂参数,包括抗拉强度ft和断裂韧度KIC。经正态分布分析得到重组竹断裂参数均值μf和μK,且在具有96%可靠性范围几乎覆盖了全部试验离散点,结果如下:ft=μf=216.36 MPa,KIC=μK=16.76 MPa·m1/2。并利用实验室常规尺寸试样预测重组竹断裂参数,与试验结果之间的误差仅为3.17%。此外,随着重组竹试样缝高比α的增加,其断裂参数先增大后减小。Abstract: As a renewable and green composite material for buildings, bamboo scrimber has the advantages of densified and uniform micro-structure, high strength, variable size and shape and high utilization rate of raw materials. Therefore, bamboo scrimber has a broad prospect in civil engineering. In order to study the quasi-brittle fracture of bamboo scrimber in the transverse direction, three-point-bending tests were carried out on single-edge-notch (SEN) bamboo scrimber samples with different sizes. Based on the boundary effect model (BEM) in fracture mechanics, a quantified relation between the micro-structure and the mechanical properties of bamboo scrimber was established by introducing an important micro-structure parameter—average grain size G. Its transverse fracture parameters including tensile strength ft and fracture toughness KIC were calculated by the peak loads Pmax obtained from the tests. Then, the normal distribution was adopted to obtain μf and μK, the mean value of the fracture parameters as well as to cover the experimental scatters with 96% reliability, with the result as follows: ft=μf=216.36 MPa, KIC=μK=16.76 MPa·m1/2. The fracture parameters can be predicted by normal-size samples in the laboratory, and the error between the predicted and tested results is only 3.17%. The fracture parameters tend to increase first and then decrease with the increase of crack length to sample height ratio.
-
Key words:
- bamboo scrimber /
- fracture parameter /
- quasi-brittle fracture /
- boundary effect model /
- size effect
-
图 2 不同高度几何相似重组竹SEN试样示意图
No.1-6 refers to the sample groups with different heights:No.1:S-10-2.5-0.3; No.2:S-20-2.5-0.3; No.3:S-30-2.5-0.3; No.4:S-50-2.5-0.3; No.5:S-100-2.5-0.3; No.6:S-150-2.5-0.3.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of bamboo scrimbers’ SEN samples with different heights which are geometrically similar
表 1 10组不同W、 S/W和α的重组竹单边缺口(SEN)试样
Table 1. Ten groups of bamboo scrimbers’ single-edge-notch (SEN) samples with different W, S/W and α
Group class Group No. W/mm B/mm S/mm L/mm S/W a0/mm a0/W Different height W with the same span-height ratio S/W and α(a0/W) S-10-2.5-0.3 10 21 25 75 2.5 3 0.3 S-20-2.5-0.3 20 21 50 100 2.5 6 0.3 S-30-2.5-0.3 30 21 75 125 2.5 9 0.3 S-50-2.5-0.3 50 21 125 225 2.5 15 0.3 S-100-2.5-0.3 100 21 250 330 2.5 30 0.3 S-150-2.5-0.3 150 21 375 475 2.5 45 0.3 Different α(a0/W) with the same span-height ratio S/W and height W S-50-4-0.1 50 21 200 280 4 5 0.1 S-50-4-0.2 50 21 200 280 4 10 0.2 S-50-4-0.3 50 21 200 280 4 15 0.3 S-50-4-0.4 50 21 200 280 4 20 0.4 Notes: There are three numbers in the Group No. First refers to the specimen height W, the second and the third refer to span-height ratio S/W and α. 表 2 重组竹断裂性能统计描述
Table 2. Statistical description of fracture performance of bamboo scrimber
Property Tensile strength ft Property Fracture toughness KIC Sample number 86 Sample number 86 Average vaule/MPa 216.36 Average vaule/(MPa·m1/2) 16.76 Standard deviation 26.09 Standard deviation 2.021 Median/MPa 213.24 Median/(MPa·m1/2) 16.52 Minimum value/MPa 167.05 Minimum value/(MPa·m1/2) 12.94 Maximum value/MPa 267.93 Maximum value/(MPa·m1/2) 20.75 Skewness 0.73 Skewness 0.73 Kurtosis –0.947 Kurtosis –0.947 -
[1] SHARMA B, GATÓO A, BOCK M, et al. Engineered bamboo for structural applications[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2015,81:6-73. [2] SHARMA B, GATÓO A, BOCK M, et al. Engineered bamboo: State of the art[C]. Proceedings of the institution of Civil Engineers Constriction Materials, 2014. [3] HUANG D S, BIAN Y L, ZHOU A P, et al. Experimental study on stress-strain relationships and failure mechanisms of parallel strand bamboo made from phyllostachys[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2015,77:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.012 [4] HUANG D S, BIAN Y L, HUANG D M, et al. An ultimate-state-based-model for inelastic analysis of intermediate slenderness PSB columns under eccentrically compressive load[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2015,94:306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.059 [5] HUANG D S, ZHOU A P, BIAN Y L. Experimental and analytical study on the nonlinear bending of parallel strand bamboo beams[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2013,44:191-196. [6] DUAN K, HU X Z. Specimen boundary induced size effect on quasi-brittle fracture[J]. Strength Fracture Complex,2004(2):47-68. [7] 张楚汉, 唐欣薇, 周元德, 等. 混凝土细观力学研究进展综述[J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(12):1-18. doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20151201ZHANG Chuhan, TANG Xinwei, ZHOU Yuande, et al. State-of-the-art literature review on concrete meso-scale mechanics[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering,2015,34(12):1-18(in Chinese). doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20151201 [8] 李冬, 金浏, 杜修力, 等. 考虑材料层次尺寸效应影响的混凝土力学性能理论预测方法[J]. 水力学报, 2018, 49(4):464-473.LI Dong, JIN Liu, DU Xiuli, et al. A theoretical method to predict the mechanical properties of concrete considering of the size effect in material[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineerin,2018,49(4):464-473(in Chinese). [9] 管俊峰, 胡晓智, 王玉锁, 等. 用边界效应理论考虑断裂韧性和拉伸强度对破坏的影响[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(10):1298-1306.GUAN Junfeng, HU Xiaozhi, WANG Yusuo, et al. Effect of fracture toughness and tensile strength on fracture based on boundary effect theory[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2016,47(10):1298-1306(in Chinese). [10] LIU W, YU Y, HU X Z, et al. Quasi-brittle fracture criterion of bamboo-based fiber composites in transverse direction based on boundary effect model[J]. Composite Structures,2019,220:347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.008 [11] 杜修力, 金浏, 李东. 混凝土与混凝土结构尺寸效应述评(I): 材料层次[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(9):28-45.DU Xiuli, JIN Liu, LI Dong. A state-of-the-art review on the size effect of concretes and concrete structures (I): Concrete materials[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2017,50(9):28-45(in Chinese). [12] 高雪阳, 江世永, 飞渭, 等. 高韧性水泥基复合材料强度尺寸效应试验研究与正交分析[J]. 中国材料进展, 2017, 36(6):473-478.GAO Xueyang, JIANG Shiyong, FEI Wei, et al. Experimental study and orthogonal analysis of strength size effect of high toughness cementitious composite[J]. Materials China,2017,36(6):473-478(in Chinese). [13] BLANK L, FINK G, JOCKWER R, et al. Quasi-brittle fracture and size effect of glued laminated timber beams[J]. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products,2017,75:667-681. doi: 10.1007/s00107-017-1156-0 [14] 上官蔚蔚. 重组竹物理力学性质基础研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2015.SHANGGUAN Weiwei. Research on physical and mechanical properties of bamboo scrimber[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2015(in Chinese). [15] 魏洋, 纪雪微, 端茂军, 等. 重组竹轴向应力-应变关系模型[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(3):572-579.WEI Yang, JI Xuewei, DUAN Maojun, et al. Model for axial stress-strain relationship of bamboo scrimber[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2018,35(3):572-579(in Chinese). [16] 魏洋, 周梦倩, 袁礼得. 重组竹柱偏心受压力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2016, 33(2):379-385.WEI Yang, ZHOU Mengqian, YUAN Lide. Mechanical performance of glulam bamboo columns under eccentric loading[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2016,33(2):379-385(in Chinese). [17] 杨蕾, 周爱萍, 黄东升, 等. 基于VIC-3D的重组竹I型断裂参数确定方法[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(5):104-110.YANG Lei, ZHOU Aiping, HUANG Dongsheng, et al. Determination of mode-I fracture parameters of parallel strand bamboo based on VIC-3D technology[J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science Edition),2016,38(5):104-110(in Chinese). [18] GATÓO A, SHARMA B, BOCK M, et al. Sustainable structures: Bamboo standards and building codes[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Sustainability,2014,167(5):189-196. doi: 10.1680/ensu.14.00009 [19] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness testing of high strength metallic materials: ASTM E399-12e2[S]. Philadephia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013. [20] XU S L, REINHARDT H W. Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture, Part I: Experimental investigation of crack propagation[J]. Fracture,1999,98(2):111-149. doi: 10.1023/A:1018668929989 [21] HU X Z, DUAN K. Size effect and quasi-brittle fracture: The role of FRP[J]. International Journal of Fracture,2008,154(1-2):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s10704-008-9290-7 [22] ZHANG C G, HU X Z, WU Z M, et al. Influence of grain size on granite strength and toughness with reliability by normal distribution[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics,2018,96:534-544. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.07.001 [23] 管俊峰, 王强, 胡晓智, 等. 考虑骨料尺寸的混凝土岩石边界效应断裂模型[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(12):22-30.GUAN Junfeng, WANG Qiang, HU Xiaozhi, et al. Boundary effect frature model for concrete and granite considering aggregate size[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2017,34(12):22-30(in Chinese). [24] 管俊峰, 胡晓智, 李庆斌, 等. 边界效应与尺寸效应模型的本质区别及相关设计应用[J]. 水利学报, 2017, 48(8):955-967.GUAN Junfeng, HU Xiaozhi, LI Qingbin, et al. Essential difference and design application of boundary effect model and size effect model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2017,48(8):955-967(in Chinese).