Low-speed impact response of the composite sandwich panels with S-type foldcore filled by foam
-
摘要: 为了研究泡沫填充褶皱夹芯结构低速冲击响应特性与损伤机制,采用热压法制备了玻璃纤维增强S型褶皱夹芯板,并使用聚氨酯泡沫进行了填充,通过落锤试验机对夹芯板节点与基座两个位置进行了冲击试验。研究表明,冲击位置对泡沫填充褶皱夹芯板的失效模式存在影响。当冲击位置为节点时,夹芯板芯子以凸侧面曲面壁压溃断裂失效为主,泡沫的填充起到了提供力矩的作用。当冲击位置为基座时,夹芯板芯子以凹侧面曲面壁撕裂和凸侧面曲面壁压溃失效为主,夹芯板损伤沿板厚度方向扩展充分,导致冲击载荷均匀化。在相同冲击能量下,节点与基座冲击相比,夹芯板的最大载荷力提高,并且比较稳定。此外,节点载荷峰值产生的冲击位移较低于基座冲击。Abstract: In order to study the low-velocity impact response characteristics and damage mechanism of foam filled sandwich structure with folded core, the glass fiber reinforced S-type sandwich panel with folded core was prepared by hot pressing. Sandwich panel was filled by polyurethane foam, and the impact test was carried out on two positions of sandwich panel notes and pedestal through the drop weight testing machine. The research shows that the impact position greatly affects the failure mode of the S-type sandwich panels folded core filled by foam. When the impact position is node, the core of the sandwich panel collapsing and collapsing is mainly caused by the convex side surface wall. When the impact position is node, the core of the sandwich panel collapsing and breaking is mainly caused by the convex side surface wall, and the filling of the foam plays a role in providing torque. When the impact position is the pedestal, the core of the sandwich panel is mainly caused by the tearing of the concave surface wall and the crushing failure of the convex surface wall. The damage of the sandwich panel extends fully along the thickness direction of the plate, resulting in the homogenization of the impact load. Under the same impact energy, the maximum impact load of the node is higher than that of the pedestal, and it is more stable. In addition, the impact displacement caused by the peak load of the node is lower than that of the base impact.
-
Key words:
- sandwich structure /
- foldcore /
- impact /
- failure mechanism /
- composite
-
表 1 S型褶皱芯子单胞参数
Table 1. Parameters of S-type foldcore cell
H/mm R/mm m/mm t/mm θ/(°) α/(°) 19 10 2 1.5 30 60 表 2 夹芯板最大冲击载荷对比
Table 2. Comparison of the maximum impact load of sandwich panel
Impact position Impact energy/J 50 100 150 200 300 Node impact maximum load/N 11 313 12 238 12 715 12 202 12 282 Base impact maximum load/N 4 661 9 156 11 654 12 208 6 808 -
[1] ZHU F, LU G. A review of blast and impact of metallic and sandwich structures[J]. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering,2007,7(1):92-101. [2] ZHANG X, XU F, ZANG Y, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on damage behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Compo-site Structures,2020,236:111882. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111882 [3] YANG J S, ZHANG W M, YANG F, et al. Low velocity impact behavior of carbon fibre composite curved corrugated sandwich shells[J]. Composite Structures,2020,238:112027. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112027 [4] 蔡林刚, 杜志鹏, 李晓彬, 等. 爆炸冲击波与破片联合作用下泡沫夹芯板的毁伤特性研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2020, 44(2):316-320.CAI Lingang, DU Zhipeng, LI Xiaobin, et al. Study on damage characteristic of foam sandwich panel under combined action of explosion shock wave and fragments[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering),2020,44(2):316-320(in Chinese). [5] HEIMBS S, CICHOSZ J, KLAUS M, et al. Sand-wich structures with textile-reinforced composite foldcores under impact loads[J]. Composite structures,2010,92(6):1485-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.001 [6] GU Z P, WU X Q, LI Q M, et al. Dynamic compressive behaviour of sandwich panels with lattice truss core filled by shear thickening fluid[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering,2020,143:130616. [7] SILVERBERG J L, EVANS A A, MCLEOD L, et al. Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical meta materials[J]. Science,2014,345(6197):647-650. doi: 10.1126/science.1252876 [8] FELTON S, TOLLEY M, DEMAINE E, et al. A method for building self-folding machines[J]. Science,2014,345(6197):644-646. doi: 10.1126/science.1252610 [9] MIURA K. Zeta-Core Sandwich-Its Concept and Realization[M]. Institute of Space and Aeronauti-cal Science, University of Tokyo, 1972. [10] NGUYEN M Q, JACOMBS S S, THOMSON R S, et al. Simulation of impact on sandwich struc-tures[J]. Composite structures,2005,67(2):217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.018 [11] HEIMBS S, MIDDENDORF P, HAMPF C, et al. Aircraft sandwich structures with folded core un-der impact load[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sandwich Structures, ICSS8, Por-to, Portugal, 2008. [12] 张延昌, 王自力, 张世联, 等. 基于折叠式夹层板船体结构耐撞性设计[J]. 船舶工程, 2009, 31:1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6982.2009.03.001ZHANG Yanchang, WANG Zili, ZHANG Shilian, et al. Hull structural crashworthy design based on folding sandwich panel[J]. Ship Engineering,2009,31:1-5(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6982.2009.03.001 [13] BASILY B B, ELSAYED E A. Dynamic axial crushing of multilayer core structures of folded Chevron patterns[J]. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology,2004,21(1-3):169-185. [14] 张培文, 李世强, 王志华, 等. 爆炸载荷作用下具有可折叠芯层夹芯梁的动态响应[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(1):140-147.ZHANG Peiwen, LI Shiqiang, WANG Zhihua, et al. Dynamic response of sandwich beam with foldable core under blast loading[J]. Explosion and shock waves,2018,38(1):140-147(in Chinese). [15] 王涛. 新型褶皱夹芯结构的设计及其力学性能分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.WANG Tao. Design and mechanical properties analysis of new folds sandwich structure[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018(in Chinese). [16] GATTAS J M, YOU Z. The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2015,53:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.019 [17] KILCHERT S, JOHNSON A F, VOGGENREITER H. Modelling the impact behaviour of sandwich structures with folded composite cores[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing,2014,57:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.023 [18] ZANG S, ZHOU X, WANG H, et al. Foldcores made of thermoplastic materials: Experimental study and finite element analysis[J]. Thin-Walled Structures,2016,100:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.12.017 [19] KLAUS M, REIMERDES H G, GUPTA N K. Experimental and numerical investigations of residual strength after impact of sandwich panels[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering,2012,44:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.01.001 [20] CONG L X, SUN Y G. Compression response of sandwich structure with M-type CFRP fold-core[C]//Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publications LTD, 2014, 1049: 1071-1074. [21] DENG A, JI B, ZHOU X, et al. Geometric design and mechanical properties of foldcores based on the generalized Resch patterns[J]. Thin-Walled Structures,2020,148:106516. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106516 [22] DENG A, JI B, ZHOU X. Quasi-static mechanical properties of novel generalized Resch-pattern composite fold-cores[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,2020:0954406220940000. [23] HARRIS J A, MCSHANE G J. Metallic stacked origami cellular materials: Additive manufacturing, properties, and modelling[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2020,185:448-466. [24] STURM R, FISCHER S. Virtual design method for controlled failure in foldcore sandwich panels[J]. Applied Composite Materials,2015,22(6):791-803. doi: 10.1007/s10443-015-9436-5 [25] 丛立新. 复合材料褶皱夹芯结构的制备及其力学行为研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.CONG Lixin. Fabrication and mechanical behavior of composite sandwich structure with folded core[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015(in Chinese). [26] SUN Y G, LI Y X. Prediction and experiment on thecompressive property of the sandwich structure with achevron carbon fibre reinforced composite folded core[J]. Compo-sites Science and Technology,2017,150:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.029 [27] DU Y D, SONG C, XIONG J, et al. Fabrication and mechanical behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced composite foldcore based on curved-crease origami[J]. Composites Science and Technology,2019:94-105. [28] MUHS F, MIDDENDORF P. Mechanical performance of curved sandwich foldcores[C]. SAMPE Europe 2017-Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Stuttgart, 2018. [29] ZHANG G, WANG B, MA L, et al. Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels[J]. Composite Structures,2014,108:304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.040 [30] YOO S H, CHANG S H, SUTCLIFFE M P F. Compressive characteristics of foam-filled composite egg-box sandwich panels as energy absorbing structures[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing,2010,41(3):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.010 [31] CHEN Y, HOU S, FU K, et al. Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structures: Modelling and experiment[J]. Composite Structures,2017,168:322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.064 [32] HEIMBS S, MIDDENDORF P, HAMPF C, et al. Aircraft sandwich structures with folded core under impact load[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sandwich Structures, ICSS8, Porto, Portugal, 2008.